/nsfw/ - Not Safe For Work

Porn for the AI Enthusiast


New Reply
Name
×
Email
Message
Files Max 5 files10MB total
Tegaki
Password
[New Reply]


00014-3280145828.png
[Hide] (8.8MB, 3840x2160)
Exodus Edition

Previous Thread: 

>LOCAL WEBUI
Automatic1111: https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki
Optimizations: https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/pull/15821 | https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/pull/15837 | https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/pull/15824

Forge : https://github.com/lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge
Maintained fork (reForge): https://github.com/Panchovix/stable-diffusion-webui-reForge

ComfyUI: https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI

>LOCAL MODELS
https://civitai.com/models/257749/
https://civitai.com/models/288584/

>PAID
NovelAI: https://rentry.org/hdg-nai-v3
NAI API/prompting in A1111: https://github.com/Metachs/sdwebui-nai-api

>FAQ
https://rentry.org/y53own6d

>RESOURCES
Features: https://github.com/AUTOMATIC1111/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki/Features
Training: https://civitai.com/articles/138/making-a-lora-is-like-baking-a-cake (replace asap) | https://github.com/bmaltais/kohya_ss | https://github.com/Nerogar/OneTrainer
Tags: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/tag_groups | https://danbooru.donmai.us/related_tag
ControlNet: https://rentry.org/dummycontrolnet | https://civitai.com/models/136070/controlnetxl-cnxl | https://huggingface.co/2vXpSwA7/iroiro-lora/tree/main/test_controlnet2
IOPaint (LamaCleaner): https://huggingface.co/spaces/Sanster/iopaint-lama | https://www.iopaint.com/install
Upscaler models: https://civitai.com/models/147641/nmkd-siax-cx | https://civitai.com/models/148120?modelVersionId=165243
4chanX Catbox/NAI prompt userscript: https://rentry.org/hdgcb
Pony-related: https://rentry.org/ponyxl_loras_n_stuff | https://rentry.org/ponyxl_lora_previews | https://lite.framacalc.org/4ttgzvd0rx-a6jf
List of useful a1111 extensions: https://rentry.org/8csaevw5
Comfy nodes and resources : https://comfyanonymous.github.io/ComfyUI_examples/ | https://openart.ai/workflows/templates
Other software: https://krita.org/en/download/ | https://cascadeur.com/download | https://terawell.net/en/page-download.php

*OLD*
https://rentry.org/t29ptzor

OP Template/Logo: https://rentry.org/85umcpm5 | https://files.catbox.moe/xk99gy.png (embed) | https://files.catbox.moe/35bdt5.gif (embed)
Just for some awareness on rules - nsfw furry or anime/ecchi content goes here in /nsfw/. For logical separation purposes, the equivalent to the 4ch trash /sdg/ general should be it's own thread under the /nsfw/ board. Happy posting. Just remember, no realistic looking photographs.

= REQUEST ANCHOR =

This post now serves as a request anchor. Quote this post with your request, and have someone gen it.
Last edited by Hidden User
Replies: >>97
{{{frieren}}},_{copyright_sousou_no_frieren},_artist_fizrotart,_artist_sweetoned_s-2928711723.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 832x1216)
image_00234.png
[Hide] (3.4MB, 1856x1568)
No reply functionality yet? Bummer.
Anyway, nice frieren gen
Replies: >>9
>>8
Just click on the post ID number to reply.
Replies: >>10 >>11
F0EA4wLZk4.png
[Hide] (13.3KB, 416x381)
>>9
When the reply to thread option is minimised, it'll appear at the top and bottom of the thread.
>>9
I'm just retarded and clicked on No. instead.
Replies: >>12
>>11
Everyone has that day, no worries, have a good one.
2313_665414af45573add.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
your squirrel job, kind sirs
Replies: >>14
>>13
Cute. Kinda wanna see her with massive buckteeth
8e5a4a5dcb01b2c3dfb94f066b053675db0ebf7eb61ebc23b4ddc8a781514a7c.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1024x1024)
9784323bc732c37a08daa829ce86871d8f66695c5eed6a2c152dc5e62a81be10.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1024x1024)
c7b1679e74f2e8dd15cb760df3329893ed1d0daeba9da134b8e4a3fb6a13582b.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1024x1024)
reposts desu
00109-1918035126.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1024x1024)
Apparently it was the 30th anniversary of Darkstalkers the other day, so have a Felicia. Tell those fuckers at Capcom to make a new game.
Replies: >>18
>>17
nice Felicia

someone get us some Morrigan STAT
Replies: >>19
00004-261016703.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1216x832)
00005-261016704.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1216x832)
00006-261016705.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1216x832)
00007-261016706.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1216x832)
>>18
I got you man, have a storyboard
Replies: >>21
00110-834698073.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1216x832)
One more post, testing something.
Replies: >>30
>>19
Hot
benin in bagina :DDD
1721106420424-tegaki.png
[Hide] (38KB, 1024x1024)
jordach, when cascade 3.6b comes out and is fully baked, ban all pony gens on this board
_gotoh_hitori,_{{kyokucho,_deadnooodles,_ciloranko}},_medium_breasts,_shaded_fac_s-1647087077.png
[Hide] (2.8MB, 1536x1536)
{{kyokucho,_deadnooodles,_ciloranko}},_long_hair,_hair_bow,_blush,_medium_breast_s-2728396881.png
[Hide] (3MB, 1856x1280)
Will cascade be able to do something like pic related (holding a sword while doing some sort of stance) with pure prompt? I tried my hardest to do something like this with pony but I just couldn't (prompt only, no controlnet or extreme inpaint)
Replies: >>25 >>33
>>24
my guess is that 1b maybe, but will require some inpaint
3.6b likely yeap, with no problem at all
Replies: >>27 >>28
>>25
Fun tip Cascade/Reso both support UnCLIP embeddings from within ComfyUI, so you can supply an image to teach it what the image should look like compiositionally. Can be a bit fiddly to get working.
{{ciloranko,_rrr,_kincora}},_black_hair,_twintails,_grey_eyes,_evil_smile,_mediu_s-3344160599.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1856x1280)
blue_hair,_long_hair,_yellow_eyes,_blue_bodysuit,_bare_shoulders,_breasts,_cleav_s-2651823161.png
[Hide] (2.8MB, 1856x1280)
bremerton_(azur_lane),_armpit_peek,_assault_rifle,_camouflage,_chest_rig,_desert_s-1382150696.png
[Hide] (3.1MB, 1280x1856)
>>25
Cool, what about guns, musical instruments or vehicles on the background? in fact, what kind of backgrounds could we expect from the 3.6b model?, sorry if the images aren't even /e/ but I want to use them as reference
Replies: >>29
>>28
>guns
mmmmm i think that one will be a hard one cuz of dataset, the poorly captioned dataset that is coming from gelbooru for this finetune won't help at all for things like these buuuut it also depends if the model already knows guns or not, if yes then maaaybe it could be fine 
>musical instruments
already recognized by the base cascade so it could be fine
>vehicles
also recognized but don't expect it to be able to understand a specific type, brand or series of vehicles due to gelbooru shenaningans again 
>backgrounds
current 1b it's trying it's best to do backgrounds but judging from the prototypes baked weeks ago, the 1b will do simple backgrounds with a chance of it coming kinda uncanny and the 3.6b will be able to do very good backgrounds and interesting compositions most of the time
Replies: >>30 >>32
>>29
There's no need to be in fear of me striking out for insults towards Reso. It's all feedback on the model in one form or another, which is more valuable than gold. I'm currently experimenting with refining/hi-res fixing outputs to look cleaner. Seems to work. Inpainting will be a lot more difficult on the other hand.
>>20
Do note that loli, shota etc can be posted. Please do keep those strictly to the /cdg/ thread just for easier clean up. (More so for thread house rules to keep things semi-close to the original 4chan board rules)
I'm not going to move/remove it - just letting you know that there's a dedicated almost no holds barred thread for less vanilla topics.
Replies: >>31 >>38
>>30
hello j
>There's no need to be in fear of me striking out for insults towards Reso. 
nah i'm being completely honest with you. if i think that the model is pure garbage i will, but not the case, i mean it hasn't even finished baking, and 1b has shown us that it's cleaning itself slowly. now imagine a finished 3.6b. to judge an unfinished model is the most retarded thing ever
it's just that this first revision of reso will be greatly limited due to shitty gelbooru's tag retardation. it will get as better as naiv3 if we're talking about prompt comprehension. which will make the model very stiff about boorus tags, so basically e6 tags will do a huge lifting here.
if you manage to get rid of those tags for the next revision of reso and do the right thing, it can easily become the best local model available for anime and basically anything non-realism related
Replies: >>34
houshou_marine,_houshou_marine__(1st_costume_),_standing,_leaning_to_the_side,_a_s-4232839676.png
[Hide] (2.3MB, 1856x1280)
>>29
I see, I see, what I mostly expect it to do is to provide a good base gen on average (just like NAI does) so I can just inpaint the little details

>vehicles
>also recognized but don't expect it to be able to understand a specific type, brand or series of vehicles due to gelbooru shenaningans again 
Sure, I don't expect to gen anything specific but something that more or less looks like it, you know, something that more or less looks like a truck, a tank, or a boat, will it be possible?
Replies: >>34 >>36
1a4832b0de0aced0074d633bcd75d3dd11131a9e95b069c13f6fbb79dad20358.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1024x1024)
96917075fd2690ed4932e4b0239aa717a13edd52af52c6ea07580600aaddcf2e.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1024x1024)
>>24
I'm a promplet and didn't put much effort in so sorry for low quality image, but it kind of understands right now? takes a little gatcha to get sword+fighting stance together, but using an artist or character that knows those better would probably help. I might've gotten better results prompting katana or something instead of sword, I don't know
Replies: >>41
image_00027.png
[Hide] (5.1MB, 2304x1952)
>>31
More of a procedural thing - I have no interest in censoring users of their personal opinions. I like the old imageboard culture and I intend to keep it that way.
>>32
Yep, most of the model's design was to essentially work like older 1.5 models where the focus was on the artistic creation part rather than gambling slop part. Yeah you can gen forever and goon, but where's the reward in that?

And furthermore - a simple hi-res fix at 32x compression easily covers up most of the issues. Ignore the cock lamp, I'm not going back for that.
Replies: >>35 >>41
>>34
>the cock lamp
my sides, a masterpiece
>>32
>something that more or less looks like a truck, a tank, or a boat, will it be possible?
yeah pretty much, just to tell you, this finetune is not using a brazillion times the base LR of the model so it's not being incredibly deep fried (ahem)
Replies: >>37 >>41
>>36
there's some vehicle knowledge from boorus anyway
Replies: >>40
>>30
Well it's your board, and your rules, but I have to say it seems foolish to divide a thread like this into multiple, separate threads. Especially when post volume is so low. Also, one of the major complaints about the /h/ thread was overpolicing of otherwise harmless loli/straight shota content.
Replies: >>39
>>38
I won't particularily care if cunny, ss or yaoi gets posted here. But if users begin requesting separation, or at least self organised house rules, Not really a set of formal rules, more of guidelines to avoid posting something in the wrong thread.
>>37
yes, but gelbooru images are very often tagged with so little effort, that is kinda hard to find a pic that has more than 10 tags (which 25% of those tags in the pic are false positives) so this ends up poisoning the well
gotoh_hitori,_{{kyokucho,_deadnooodles,_kincora}},_blush,_embarrassed,_smile,_sh_s-2486027213.png
[Hide] (2.1MB, 1280x1856)
lize_helesta,_{{kyokucho,_deadnooodles,_thomas_8000}},_breasts,_[wide_hips],_nin_s-1602427141.png
[Hide] (3MB, 1280x1856)
>>33
>but it kind of understands right now? takes a little gatcha to get sword+fighting stance together, but using an artist or character that knows those better would probably help. I might've gotten better results prompting katana or something instead of sword
Well, yeah, that's indeed a girl holding a sword while doing a fighting stance.There's some tags specific for that kind of poses like "ready to draw" and "battoujutsu stance", hopefully the full model can recognize and do them

>>34
>>36
Good to know, I'll patiently await for it and pray for your success

I'll stop posting now, thanks for all the info
38f07b95cc6fb2b093d152154a6975d01e2cd20af8995c022e08e935ab0b67c8.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1024x1024)
e26a1172918bd50743095c62d39015616ca02f0d6193b4b39e680947a5d843f8.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1024x1024)
f54c54975b8ac8000515c77cf2a49ff5a0de921f29edb94578c4fadbc4993bc4.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1024x1024)
67b8797c2747521324da2c68558aea48074435eac703b32ab3b1ede8febee076.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1024x1024)
reso e7
25.png
[Hide] (2MB, 1024x1536)
migu.jpg
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1536x1536)
found my old base cascade gens (i had no idea what i'm doing)
inpainted her faec and nipples with nai in the other one
Replies: >>52
>>43
neat, kind of reminds me of anime kigurumis
00030-4039928490.png
[Hide] (4.6MB, 3376x1408)
1721274457179-tegaki.png
[Hide] (20.1KB, 1024x1024)
00001-202001150.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 896x1152)
00002-1221983147.png
[Hide] (1MB, 896x1088)
00014-1389403054.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 896x1152)
00020-381751600.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 896x1152)
00026-263638975.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 896x1152)
Replies: >>90
00034-3494105220.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 896x1152)
00036-368413180.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 896x1152)
00207-1662510047.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 896x1152)
00194-2419574540.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 896x1152)
00124-2654309325.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 896x1152)
>>89
Replies: >>91
00119-246280483.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 896x1152)
00110-2855676981.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 896x1152)
00107-107204006.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 896x1152)
00098-2482543252.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 896x1152)
00090-1232514183.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 896x1152)
>>90
Replies: >>92
00089-2094737361.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 896x1152)
00064-3085773108.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 896x1152)
00044-2310047478.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 896x1152)
00041-1894753705.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 896x1152)
00030-2824049939.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 896x1152)
>>91
done
>>5
requesting muscular or toned females, any theme/composition/style
00050-2362135408.png
[Hide] (3MB, 1736x1736)
42517-1895455002-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (2.2MB, 1536x1824)
test
42500-3414410605-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1536x1824)
42504-1834234354-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1536x1824)
42514-2878504913-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (2MB, 1536x1824)
42518-1895455003-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1536x1824)
42519-1895455004-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (2MB, 1536x1824)
test 2
42500-3414410605-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1536x1824)
42504-1834234354-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1536x1824)
42514-2878504913-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (2MB, 1536x1824)
42518-1895455003-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1536x1824)
42519-1895455004-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (2MB, 1536x1824)
okay I need to wait I guess otherwise it uploads broken files, no indicator though
and it's 4 not 5 files
42520-1895455005-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1536x1824)
42523-3563233272-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nek.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1536x1824)
kek was the cdn just ded or did it auto link the broken images with the working ones?
Replies: >>103
>>102
Californian based DC shat the bed with regards to the Reso models last night, services might be funky - not sure about the board, it's located in SEA.
09496-230971412-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(Par.png
[Hide] (2.1MB, 1536x1824)
1683_2a228d297430577c.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 832x1216)
2698_fd86274ecdc51215.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1024x1024)
you can create anything with AI, black serafuku, white serafuku, simply enter serafuku
if you fail to enter serafuku, a penalty will be applied to your social credit score
Replies: >>108
test
42741-2524981995-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(nat.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1536x1824)
can't stop won't stop
Replies: >>113
>>105
S E R A F U K U
E
R
A
F
U
K 
U
2226_e0fb96c87a74f1b3.png
[Hide] (803.1KB, 832x1216)
eggplant
1boy,_1girl,_artist_dicksword,_artist_groidspammer,_artist_ponylebad,_artist_res_s-2075444160.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
1boy,_1girl,_artist_dicksword,_artist_groidspammer,_artist_ponylebad,_artist_res_s-2073709685.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
Behold.
Replies: >>112 >>116
>>111
Cool website. Those should be these:
https://files.catbox.moe/d3q439.png
https://files.catbox.moe/njwu49.png
42670-2524981995-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(Par.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1536x1824)
42676-4012706419-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(Par.png
[Hide] (1.8MB, 1536x1824)
42681-4103241736-score_9,_score_8_up,_score_7_up,_score_6_up,_score_5_up,_score_4_up,_source_anime,_(by_abmayo,_saz_1.0),_(solo,_1girl_1.2),_(Par.png
[Hide] (1.8MB, 1536x1824)
>>107
finally autoupdate and setting working
also dropping files
we're back
>>111
Booba
2624_cda9ee96cf48152a.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 832x1216)
2630_658dbb5957c8578b.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 832x1216)
can't stop won't stop
Replies: >>126
da1adc973b1bf2a5b042ae3e825b8f17f119cfe5fc070047c8a8a1b6e6088f48.png
[Hide] (2.3MB, 1920x1088)
>>120

multiviews are hard, but no doubt the most rewarding on gens.
2177_197ea09477778e87.png
[Hide] (1MB, 832x1216)
booba
fbb4e91c8ce3d828178c233118e37a792a963f247178b61b42f9f5a378a80ce9.png
[Hide] (2.4MB, 1920x1088)
image_00027.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
ComfyUI_00133_.png
[Hide] (1013.1KB, 1024x1024)
a comparison. the results out of the wdv aren't quite right, dunno if it needs negatives to remove "fisting"
t29.jpg
[Hide] (2.1MB, 1664x2432)
t31.jpg
[Hide] (3.4MB, 2328x3400)
t32.jpg
[Hide] (3.7MB, 3400x2328)
Replies: >>323
t9.jpg
[Hide] (2.1MB, 2432x1664)
t10.jpg
[Hide] (2.1MB, 2432x1664)
t13.jpg
[Hide] (2.3MB, 1664x2432)
t14.jpg
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1664x2432)
Replies: >>323
t25.jpg
[Hide] (3.9MB, 3400x2328)
t27.jpg
[Hide] (3.6MB, 2328x3400)
Replies: >>323
Ponytism_Out_01732_.png
[Hide] (8.2MB, 1728x3024)
02301-2805218791-misaka_mikoto,_facesitting,_sports_bikini,_footjob,_toes,_feet,_penis,_faceless_male,_angry,_ejaculation,_hair_flower,.png
[Hide] (2.2MB, 1344x1728)
Damn, a 3 day for that fried kuro? Brutal
Replies: >>154 >>157
image(2939c).png
[Hide] (5.7MB, 1856x3200)
>>153
Was a fairly aged up Kuro too. Double anyone could even think it's a loli if not for recognizable character design.
I remember this Misaka gen. Nice one.
image(429).png
[Hide] (3.9MB, 1536x2304)
>doesn't look like I forgot anything
>OKAY, ready to go, Fern!
>>153
>3 day for that fried kuro? Brutal
Getting 3day for that Kuro post is straight up hilarious. Like she literally has mature hips and tits there. 
Yeah claiming that troon jannies stopped being retarded was a bit premature.
Replies: >>160
ComfyUI_13278_.png
[Hide] (966.3KB, 880x1160)
Ankha is not a furry, just a catgirl with yellow skin.
>>157
seems they got even weirder.
I got a 1d for telling someone spamming /aco/ to fuck off, like 16 hours after the fact.
https://files.catbox.moe/yymqo5.png
Replies: >>162
>>160
Mods killed the whole thread. Man what a shithole it's become.

Guess I'll try and keep this place somewhat alive for 3 days, see if it gets going.
Replies: >>163 >>165
>>162
It should pick up once people realise that I was telling the truth about building a better place without retarded fuckhead mods.
ComfyUI_temp_raepj_00002_.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1024x1024)
>>162
I think you might be misunderstanding something. The two threads mods killed were "local" and "nai" split troll threads. I don't see anything happening to the normal /hdg/, it's still up.
Replies: >>166
>>165
I meant the drop in activity. A single post in 45 minutes.
Replies: >>167
Gen_06210_.png
[Hide] (3.5MB, 1536x2304)
>>166
Yeah well it's dead indeed. RIP
ComfyUI_temp_nzqfa_00012_.png
[Hide] (880KB, 760x1280)
Open question, why do you post your gens on anonymous message boards? Instead of (or in addition to) all the other places.
3007_8d88c2d62d996f72.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
3051_caa2b989619b610c.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
ComfyUI_temp_nzqfa_00029_.png
[Hide] (752.8KB, 760x1280)
>>169
I think it's the feedback. I need criticism to improve, but on R34 you only get some cringe roleplay comments. On Civit and Pixiv you get emojis, and the culture is too hugbox-y. No one there shits on images, even ones that deserve it.
>>169
I don't care that much about views and nosebleed elephants on pixiv or twitter, don't care about views. 
Posting on anonymous message boards was the most fun to me when the threads were good. Now I do post on pixiv, but it feels hollow.
Replies: >>179
>>169
I don't like interacting with people, but also, I like sharing stuff for other people to enjoy. Imageboards are a happy medium.
Replies: >>179
>>177
Is this not more interactive than just dropping an image on Pixiv and moving on? Guess the anonymity helps a bit.

>>174
>when the threads were good
I wonder what changed. Feels like we talk less about posted gens, not just post fewer of them.
Replies: >>183
>>169
I post occasionally to pixiv and sparsely to twitter.
but posting to an imageboard is a low pressure way to reflect on and find mistakes/errors that weren't as obvious prior(since it's now "no longer in your hands" compared to staring at it for half an hour in-process). Also doesn't require censoring like pixiv does.
And like the other anon said, it's just significantly higher quality interaction if you get it. You can also generally pose a question/whatever alongside it should you need to and get a response more often than not.
>>179
>Is this not more interactive than just dropping an image on Pixiv and moving on?
It can be. On here (and other imageboards), it's very easy to to just drop images and leave. Since uploads aren't tied to an identity, I don't have to manage any sort of persona, nor worry about mistakes in images, or engagement.
Weird that treech also prunes metadata, keeping them in would be really convenient for an AI board. Or at least making the catbox extension work.
Replies: >>185
>>184
There is a setting for the board, lemme take a look.
Alright, it shouldn't delete metadata now.
Replies: >>189
ComfyUI_02013_.png
[Hide] (1MB, 880x1160)
test
>>186
It works, thanks!
Replies: >>190
>>189
No worries. -J
{kousaka_kirino,_ore_no_imouto_ga_konna_ni_kawaii_wake_ga_nai},_asura_(asurauser_s-2253064418.png
[Hide] (3MB, 1920x1088)
{kousaka_kirino,_ore_no_imouto_ga_konna_ni_kawaii_wake_ga_nai},_asura_(asurauser_s-826097070.png
[Hide] (3.3MB, 1920x1088)
{kousaka_kirino,_ore_no_imouto_ga_konna_ni_kawaii_wake_ga_nai},_asura_(asurauser_s-1762286135.png
[Hide] (3.3MB, 1920x1088)
3117_1e79ed06dadfa664.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1024x1024)
3118_1055e41e08cf5c5c.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1024x1024)
Replies: >>195
>>192
is this NAI?
Replies: >>196 >>197
>>195
my bet is on cascade
>>195
it is NAI. the metadata is available as well.
Replies: >>201
3025_647082ba5f8a7cfd.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1024x1024)
3032_1b72398c21fb04a6.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1024x1024)
goofs
SoteDiffusion-Wuerstchen3_00250_.png
[Hide] (3.8MB, 1664x2432)
SoteDiffusion-Wuerstchen3_00166_.png
[Hide] (4.1MB, 1664x2432)
>>197
the default ai generated no artist look fooled me
1276_b49589dec502599e.png
[Hide] (1MB, 832x1216)
3144_c2aa035273283ee9.png
[Hide] (999.4KB, 832x1216)
2515_557fd8bf77b9785f.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1024x1024)
3004_df87040b92cf95a8.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
3187_c56ac00a541a9a06.png
[Hide] (985.9KB, 832x1216)
3215_45c4eab1620980ec.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 832x1216)
a8e31f6c0d0af3e6a13bad8c2594b1abafde283a25e06c343b3d46ba67f1f6fe.png
[Hide] (3.1MB, 1856x1280)
482a541872bf884c0a413e1307f883d9912b6401025d2805066799ba0f2acef9.png
[Hide] (2.9MB, 1280x1856)
8aea50fa0a9a69eea8f73c92899eca8cf6640174ac6f1f6630257c84e9ce7e3f.png
[Hide] (3MB, 1856x1280)
097d8f2553b7010e895594d2940ae07a9ce42c78965be3d3b27deddc3a74d0ab.png
[Hide] (3MB, 1536x1536)
e9148faf151f99e6e298e1a6af174adff9e1fafa8c71dbfa255f1e606fd01d0e.png
[Hide] (2.5MB, 1536x1536)
3156_1cec44928dd52049.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 832x1216)
2983_42b4fbd45d61141b.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1024x1024)
3122_3dad36398f382671.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
3241_578b2fffc1a50924.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 832x1216)
3243_0c1ce3b976d00569.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
1e6db6073e6f2af4fd8a998b2cd21d54894e5c2156a1d79675157b42a10f3968.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1152x1632)
global mod had a meltdown on /e/ of all places.
strange times.
https://files.catbox.moe/uz5a65.png
Replies: >>252
>>251
I got banned for my Chloe post, but that was an obvious loli so whatever I guess. Other bans/removals were pretty ridiculous though. 
It's especially grating considering there's a loli thread on /e/ staying for days. It's only ai threads that have those faggot snitches.
Replies: >>253
>>252
I just find it weird that it was, in fact, a global mod doing it(that isn't the wording for report options on /e/) and that it was, similarly, a global ban. This shit is normally localized to board.
00141-1527785403.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1024x1024)
Experimenting with advanced Forge Couple prompting plus the cutaway tag and you can get some really nice composite images. The UI is also pretty intuitive, I like it a lot.
3210_d10f99bee558a022.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
3223_20fb71c47a069850.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
3135_284093fe58048e79.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
3291_5e8c804189f43a26.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
3305_688e5eb8d42da880.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
3306_253abafca3124af7.png
[Hide] (1MB, 1216x832)
s-2417651140.png
[Hide] (2.7MB, 1344x1728)
s-1485597220.png
[Hide] (2.3MB, 1344x1728)
f442ed8dab8e09acf5cc5d01311ce9727dc37be65c571b9b60d74aeb6826d8c8.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 832x1216)
https://files.catbox.moe/jo5uc4.png
Replies: >>270
>>269
This board doesn't strip image metadata, so catbox isn't a hard requirement here.
Replies: >>271
>>270
my gens are stripped of metadata due to editing. Thanks for the headups though, just figured I would drop it here since I posted it on another board also.
3321_c1d43893a4a4c814.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
3322_b55303f11e1f4805.png
[Hide] (1MB, 832x1216)
1.jpg
[Hide] (1.8MB, 1792x2304)
2.jpg
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1792x2304)
3.jpg
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1792x2304)
4.jpg
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1792x2304)
5.jpg
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1792x2304)
>Payload Too Large
whew
jpg it is
Replies: >>277 >>278
6.jpg
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1792x2304)
Replies: >>277
>>275
>>276
10/10 Very nice. Are you the "reweik anon"? (in quotations because >9000 anons use reweik now but you know who I'm talking about)
Replies: >>279
>>275
Metadata sir?
Replies: >>279
00010-1545387484.png
[Hide] (2.9MB, 1792x2304)
>>277
thanks and yeah, I am

>>278
https://files.catbox.moe/jscoqw.png
https://files.catbox.moe/ufcpc6.png
https://files.catbox.moe/todqkh.png
https://files.catbox.moe/i3ylvo.png
https://files.catbox.moe/q69d24.png
https://files.catbox.moe/9nu3rp.png
Replies: >>281
1882_535e8fc62d4f1865.png
[Hide] (1MB, 832x1216)
1536_76584728eedf7591.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
Gen_09039_.png
[Hide] (3.6MB, 1536x2304)
>>279
Happy to see you posting here.
Replies: >>291
Anyone doordash a Sarah?
Replies: >>283
>>282
File removed:

No posting of photorealistic humans.
3353_13a9363a24e1592b.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
3354_f4e96860b8718771.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 832x1216)
c1984c4b55e0dc149508383c3745a7cf19c03d2bef64c029bbc6e9ee87eb53de.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1152x1632)
9e6eeebf20258113b8359a3cee02a9bc6c0d332d14e9f1b0730567326c585e55.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1152x1632)
0ac3067a4bc1da78755d2913a3b8611f487ce2cbba5649035208285d12d3208e.png
[Hide] (2MB, 1152x1632)
00013-4073032338.png
[Hide] (3.9MB, 1792x2304)
00018-3645100521.png
[Hide] (2.9MB, 2048x2048)
>>281
2613_6c29a993198cd375.png
[Hide] (1MB, 832x1216)
2623_d68e005abec51419.png
[Hide] (1019.1KB, 832x1216)
succubi from RJ306854
cockthink.jpg
[Hide] (1.4MB, 2048x2048)
fux.jpg
[Hide] (1.1MB, 2048x1536)
jii.jpg
[Hide] (2.5MB, 1536x2304)
pelf.jpg
[Hide] (2.1MB, 1536x2688)
periments
Replies: >>299
00122-3728360550.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1216x832)
>>298
How'd you get the relatively normal text bubbles? It's almost good enough to pass for typesetting but the second image makes me think it's AI. What's the trick?
Replies: >>301
3394_bed75f02989a0391.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1024x1024)
3395_0e083c688c9aaf24.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
00146-2143131836.jpg
[Hide] (778.5KB, 2048x2048)
haiyai.jpg
[Hide] (3.2MB, 2400x1560)
00096-184694016.png
[Hide] (3.7MB, 1536x2304)
00133-3562707313.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 2048x2048)
>>299
text bubbles are from dall-e 3 and flux, they're pretty decent at it
I prompted speech/thought ones together with the images but I've also prompted all kinds of bubbles like that on their own with or without text just fine in the past. yeah it's an extremely lazy way to do it but it's fun
I then edited and upscaled the images with pony, at higher resolutions it wont mangle the text, but i guess that depends on how you do it. If I upscale image 2x and the text/bubble gets fucked up I just manually resize original image and overlay it on top of the upscaled one, blend in the non fucked up parts I want from the original and then inpaint over that with higher resolution
>the second image makes me think it's AI
if you meant the double chibi image, those are just raw ass flux gens. rest of the images have bunch of usual ai fuckery anyway
Replies: >>302
00112-1598538998.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1216x832)
>>301
Okay, that makes sense. I knew Dall-e and Flux could do text pretty well but I didn't think they could do anything that lewd. How's the times on Flux anyhow? Any chance an 8gig VRAMlet could run the model locally?
Replies: >>303
>>302
the lewd bits are inpainted with pony but Flux can do lewd to some degree, it'll give you butts, breasts and nudity but it can't draw pussies and mangles the nipples, doesn't know sex or what a phallic object is
>How's the times on Flux anyhow? Any chance an 8gig VRAMlet could run the model locally?
I'm using huggingspace so I wouldn't know about the times, but I think people with 8gb can run it
https://huggingface.co/spaces/black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-schnell
feel free to use that to give it a spin, it usually won't give you any more than what you prompt so gotta be descriptive

schnell only takes 4 steps, it's fast but image quality is much lower among other downsides that I might not even fully be aware of and I think you should be able to run it for sure but apparently you can run dev with 8gb in nf4
https://github.com/lllyasviel/stable-diffusion-webui-forge/discussions/981
dev is the better and slower one

I think most people run it on comfy but idk anything about that, all the optimizations and stuff seem to be a work in progress on Forge, so I'm just waiting to see how it goes. You'll might get more help and information asking other more knowledgeable people
Flux is fun to screw around with or create some inpainting material but the hentai side isn't quite there (yet?) but I've seen plenty of nice anime loras posted on 4chan for sfw
3420_a05658abb1aa1396.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
1482_4a695eef902a261a.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1216x832)
what breathing technique will bring shinobu back into the story
00020-4178570327.png
[Hide] (3.3MB, 2048x2048)
00034-2417052159.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1024x1024)
word.jpg
[Hide] (694.4KB, 1024x1024)
calcium rich
20mb
https://files.catbox.moe/804p12.jpg
Replies: >>309
>>308
sick
a21d30a9-b649-449e-a9b4-560b44b6500f.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1280x1280)
1bf6c9dc-5c06-42b6-86c7-8131a2bbdced.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1280x1280)
37286b55-a3c2-4688-be49-0bfbd269cefe.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1280x1280)
522b0f53-76df-4885-b7d0-fe899eca94d6.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1280x1280)
image_00183.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 832x1216)
it's cooking...
Replies: >>313
00430-749312216.png
[Hide] (4MB, 1792x2304)
Take me out from pony hell please
Replies: >>313
>>311
reminds me of that first cascade kagami image, it's come a long way
..if that's cascade

>>312
surely there are things you can do on it that you would enjoy but haven't discovered yet, don't you think so?
Replies: >>314
>>313
it is cascade. if e15 ends up being proficient at hands and such, it may actually be pretty decent.

my opinion is the prototype 3.6b and current 1b both have the same sorts of placement artifacts, which may be under-training, or in the worst case, an architectural issue. if the issue is in the architecture, it's gonna need a cluster of 100 H100s to remedy.

1b may or may not have learned everything it could have if caption shuffling is the key ingredient to getting characters and clothing.
Replies: >>315
>>314
A design goal of my models is that one should always personalise it with LoRAs or further finetuning even if it's really close. I'm much happier cooking models that handle the 99% of a booru and leaving the 1% for personal taste.

Personal taste matters.
3451_78d6a680c91b038d.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
3446_73b2c356a0971bf7.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
00103-2992134046.png
[Hide] (3.7MB, 1792x2304)
00027-1235181976.png
[Hide] (4.1MB, 1792x2304)
screwing around with new arti
seems pretty schizo but i'm having fun
1.jpg
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1664x2432)
2.jpg
[Hide] (1.3MB, 2048x2048)
3.jpg
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1664x2432)
4.jpg
[Hide] (1014.8KB, 1664x2432)
5.jpg
[Hide] (1.6MB, 3328x2432)
3474_4cc5a1bd18790d27.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1024x1024)
3476_f59aa46d3f23f298.png
[Hide] (1MB, 1024x1024)
artist_rustle,_artist_wa_(genryusui),_artist_oso_(toolate),_artist_cocoballking,_s-1610702309.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 832x1216)
g1.jpg
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1792x2304)
tail_rip.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1024x1024)
artist_opossumachine,_artist_sweetonedollar,_1girl,_shirt_lift,_huge_breasts,_br_s-858805255.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1024x1024)
{{game_screenshot,_world_of_warcraft,_world_of_warcraft_screenshot,_3d,_render}}_s-2106769555.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1216x832)
Replies: >>326
1.jpg
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1792x2304)
2.jpg
[Hide] (1MB, 1792x2304)
3.jpg
[Hide] (963.2KB, 1664x2432)
4.jpg
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1664x2432)
5.jpg
[Hide] (834.4KB, 1664x2432)
hinami
Replies: >>326
>>142
>>143
>>144
I'm like a month late but these are wonderful, which model did you use for them? also lol at fern with fern, it's cute
Replies: >>326
3582_f2b27cc0f13e36cf.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
3599_390003260e9d2749.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 832x1216)
t23.png
[Hide] (3.4MB, 1160x1696)
>>321
Nice.
>>322
Tall and skinny... one love...

>>323
>I'm like a month late
No worries, I'm still here. Everything besides Kuro (Kuro is reweik v11) is trifusion. For me it's the Fern model, kek, she's just too cute there.
https://huggingface.co/realding/trifusion_v10Enhanced/tree/main
Not sure if you'll bother using it, it's kinda weird, but here are some tips in case you are brave:
1. Use Automatic CFG with turbo turned on (implemented in reforge and exists as a custom node for comfy), it's practically a must for this model
2. Most of my gens (from those you linked all except t10, t13, t31) are i2i from black rectangle to get darker images
3. Example base resolution gen: https://files.catbox.moe/s4645j.png
The model knows Fern, for Ubel I used this lora (it takes animagine loras): https://civitai.com/models/282420?modelVersionId=317904
Replies: >>328 >>331
>>326
thanks a lot for the links and the explanation, I've been meaning to properly give comfy a try or get reforge separately to check out the new stuff, so I'll give it a shot whenever I get to it, I'm interested
>black rectangle to get darker images
smart
3653_8a082304f41334dc.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 832x1216)
3612_381c20863f1c1d5d.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1024x1024)
6b9203ea50985615aa2bca24559d6d7fa2a97f9a1deec96cba62282159ca32eb.png
[Hide] (2.7MB, 2688x896)
655b75146de8dda4fd25bcef070a8f1147eda7b35fae11a4a52c14d3162e7218.png
[Hide] (3MB, 1280x1856)
3a071eb5f5457645b6dbc910a16c453ef4a6b327a99555a235b8ddae17327d59.png
[Hide] (3MB, 1280x1856)
1.jpg
[Hide] (2.1MB, 1664x2432)
2.jpg
[Hide] (1.5MB, 2432x1664)
3.jpg
[Hide] (2MB, 1664x2432)
4.jpg
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1664x2432)
how_many_filters_can_i_slap_on_this_shit.jpg
[Hide] (2.1MB, 1536x2656)
>>326
cool model
i figured out comfy more or less but not a fan. i think the automatic CFG thing is kinda different on it too, i was mostly curious about the texture but i'm guessing it's mostly from that extension/node, idk
ended up going back to good ol forge lol. i see what you mean by automatic CFG being a must since the model seems to be kinda fried but it was fun to screw around around with it regardless
i like the way it hallucinates, reminds me of 1.5 in both good and bad ways although i haven't used animagine that much so maybe that's where most of it was coming from
Replies: >>332
>>331
Nice. Love the Ubel one, although she might need at least a small hint of the other leg peeking through somewhere to not look one-legged.
If you want to test a less fried model with similar background capabilities, the secret of trifusion-enhanced is mainly in that it's a merge of trifusion with two loras:
https://civitai.com/models/124347/xlmoreart-full-xlreal-enhancer at 0.65 clip and unet strength
https://civitai.com/models/376395/worldly-xl-or-anime-scenery-lora at 0.5 clip and unet strength
So you can merge them or just use at runtime with either ponymagine (I might be schizo but I think it has slightly more stable anatomy than animagine) or animagine which both aren't fried. You will slightly lose some of the base model look that trifusion has.
Probably the xlmoreart-full doing most of the job too, since trifusion doesn't respond strongly to pony loras.
Replies: >>333 >>334 >>335
>>332
I now see the other leg by the way, kek.
Replies: >>334 >>335
>>332
>>333
>I now see the other leg by the way, kek.
NTA but the leg does seem a bit too long.
Replies: >>335
>>332
thanks ill look into those
wouldn't be surprised if ponymagine has better anatomy

>>333
>>334
yeah there's more fuckups than that lol, doing this while sleep deprived isn't the best idea
the leg was more obscured/submerged pre upscale and i didnt pay attention to it getting more visible afterwards but yea the thighs specifically are uneven in length
4chan range blocked my mobile IPs for reporting the hdg spammer. 
This is pretty much as blatant as they can get with hostility towards AI.
Unironically starting thinking about spamming that shithole myself now, but I don't even know what VPNs work there. I got some lucky Amnezia addresses that work, but that's it, not enough. They really started getting serious about banning VPNs last year, not so long ago even mainstream shit like mullvad and nord worked alright.
Replies: >>338 >>341
>>337
Surely they won't ban us right away if we start doing things slowly, i.e. 1-2 groid images per 3 hours on each /h/ thread?
Replies: >>339 >>340
>>338
The important part is being annoying and seemingly unavoidable.
Replies: >>340
Man, I'm actually seething from this range ban. 
>>338
>1-2 groid images per 3 hours on each /h/ thread?
That's fucking nothing. It should be disruptive and obviously malicious. 
>>339
This.
Replies: >>342
>>337
I tried warning you guys months ago. Moderation is very anti-ai, this is why they ban everything you like and keep everything you hate. /e/ has been hit by a blatant spambot for a while now with nothing done about it, those who report it get banned. There really is no solution except a massive shakeup in moderation or moving to altchans like here. I fully support shitting up that entire site though just to make life hell for the faggot janitors that turned it to shit.
Replies: >>345
We need a way to get the groid images ig. Should we use his own images?
>>340
>That's fucking nothing
Most threads on /h/ are fucking slow, even with at this rate I bet some threads will fill up with shit pretty quickly. Given the amount of threads, I think posting in each one wouldn't be feasible without a bot.
>and obviously malicious.
The question is, should the pics blatantly violate board rules or should we try to hide our malicious intent from trannitors to live a little longer
Replies: >>343 >>346
>>342
if you want to be subtle just go to civit and find the sloppiest slop you can, and post it in vaguely relevant threads. I don't think this will do anything to save hdg but it will at least make them seethe a bit I guess
Replies: >>344
>>343
The civit idea is funny ngl but just as you said this won't really help /hdg/ since everyone just gonna assume that all we want is to shit everything up with AI slop, given our civitretardbros aren't in a particularly good standing.
>>341
Starting to think the groid spammer is the jannie.

>>341
Again, like the groid spammer, the jannies are working in collusion with each other. The only winning move is to silently advertise altchans.

-J
Replies: >>346
janny.png
[Hide] (15.6KB, 1749x102)
>>342
>The question is, should the pics blatantly violate board rules or should we try to hide our malicious intent from trannitors to live a little longer
Nope, they should be according to board rules, but annoying at the same time. Pretty much like groidspam: technically doesn't violate the rules but makes everyone mad.

But now that I'm no longer mad, I just don't really feel like doing this. Guys posting at koikatsu general didn't deserve to get spammed like, and nigger jannies won't give a fuck anyway. Pretty much all the other threads are semi-dead, including the nigger generals.

>>345
>Starting to think the groid spammer is the jannie.
Maybe, maybe not, but I think this post was made by an actual janny as it perfectly explains their attitude towards moderating the AI threads. Could be a LARP of course.
It's weird because it wasn't always like this. Moderation used to be almost reasonable. Spammers were dealt with, and only actual cunny removed, apart from some rare exceptions.
Replies: >>348 >>350 >>351
3713_21962a405c380167.png
[Hide] (758KB, 832x1216)
3715_e1873e947a1895ca.png
[Hide] (738.5KB, 1024x1024)
Replies: >>349
>>346
>Pretty much like groidspam: technically doesn't violate the rules but makes everyone mad.
That's why I suggested to just repost his images. Not only this will make everyone mad, it will make everyone mad mostly over the same thing. If nigger janny will start removing groid shit, that would be a win regardless.
>But now that I'm no longer mad, I just don't really feel like doing this.
He keeps posting and nothing happens for this exact reason.
>Guys posting at koikatsu general didn't deserve to get spammed
They didn't but neither did we. Are they more equal than us or what? If we make that whole shithole unusable, who will be held responsible for that first and foremost?
Replies: >>350 >>352
>>347
cute seiba
>>346
I don't browse the thread for sanity reasons but you're free to provide additional context such as this.
>>348
Jannies are that scared of lurkers making hentai that's as good as the real thing if not better. I've seen this behaviour in the furry community - where to elevate their power over others they start controlling who is allowed to create content and generally try to infiltrate creator circles. It's also happening in Furry Diffusion where saturation of good models has already reached a high point and mods are trying to endorse their own censored model that has no benefit.

-J
>>346
>but I think this post was made by an actual janny 
i shitpost occasionally using aco slops from civit to shit on notorious faggots (but most of it isn't my as i don't really want to disrupt the thread)
only one picture got ever deleted and never got any warns for that, but got multiple for ironic textposts about anime being against the rules or mention of selective enforcement of rules 
it's very clear that they support sabotaging of the thread but delete any mention of it
>>348
Spamming regular threads would be petty and  useless, now that I think of it. 
I think wiping the board entirely with guro or something else, while making it clear WHY is it happening would be a more interesting option. Probably won't help hdg, (don't think anything will now), but would be an actual fuck you to the moderators. Thing is, is anyone actually willing to do it?
00109-169959051_copy.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1152x1632)
00123-3562753914_copy.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1152x1632)
00125-1123912905_copy.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1152x1632)
00130-1375092664_copy.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1152x1632)
>even contemplating trying to """raid""" other threads for some form of retarded retribution
you are literally the biggest fagets on the planet and should kill yourselves.

that said, what even the actual fuck lmao so is this retarded janny
they even went and hit the [delete everything from user] button on me for whatever retarded reason.
Replies: >>355 >>357 >>358
00006-3817290452_copy.png
[Hide] (2.5MB, 1152x1632)
00060-2577820918_copy.png
[Hide] (128.8KB, 340x482)
00102-2213961800_copy.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1632x1152)
>>354
oh whoops I forgot to even include the catbox to the ban message. sasuga, me.
https://files.catbox.moe/b5w4tq.png
Replies: >>357
00077-2118265443_copy.png
[Hide] (221.5KB, 340x482)
00052-2567788969_copy.png
[Hide] (184.4KB, 340x482)
00079-4240158487_copy.png
[Hide] (165.6KB, 340x482)
00028-309516853_copy.png
[Hide] (210.6KB, 340x478)
00016-90571522_copy2.png
[Hide] (169.9KB, 340x478)
>>354
>>355
also I should note I was pretty much 80% sure I was going to get hit for the oekaki on the second post and didn't really care with the current state of the thread. But getting hit for miku of all fucking things was not on my bingo card.
So now I've been hit for miku, asuka, pubes, legitimate C cups and I'm not actually sure what else anymore. And not once could any of it actually be considered toddlercon.
Maybe I should start posting pitslut so I can collect an even more retarded ban.
Replies: >>359
>>354
>you are literally the biggest fagets on the planet and should kill yourselves.
Nobody's done anything and so far it's more like anons are just venting here. 
But if you start looking at it from a perspective that the "retarded" moderation is actually not retarded, but deliberately malicious, raiding the board stops feeling like an entirely unreasonable idea.
Replies: >>360
>>357
That Miku looks the youngest of the batch to me too.
Delete everything is one dumb fucking thing if somebody is actually contributing to the thread. And of course the flood of 100 almost identical images escapes this magic button.
Nowadays I switch ip's a couple times a day if I post there, so that whenever some retard hits that button they can't delete shit. Because fuck them.
Replies: >>360
00031-1519650536_copy.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1152x1632)
00019-4057498452_copy.png
[Hide] (2.6MB, 1632x1152)
00052-4243776975_copy.png
[Hide] (2.5MB, 1152x1632)
00028-2631439021_copy.png
[Hide] (2.5MB, 1152x1632)
also it appears they nuked all my shit in the two other prior threads, though it seemed to only just recently-ish happen? Pretty weird.

>>358
at that point it'd just be time to completely abandon it. And realistically that's the end outcome anyway since if you're not in a third world country on a mobile network that hasn't been range-banned yet or that somehow still uses dynamic IP's you're just going to get hit with an indefinite ban, anyway. And if you don't it'd because whatever you were doing is so inconsequential and frivolous it's not going to be a blip to anyone in "charge" anyway. So all you'll accomplish is becoming a schizophrenic autist that wastes their time trying to make things worse for other people for no real perceptible reason.

Also I really, really highly doubt any of this has to do with AI shit in specific. This is almost definitely more of a board administration structuring issue than anything else. I doubt there are many(if any) dedicated /h/ janitors/moderators. It's just not a high traffic board. So pretty much everything will end up in a global mod queue and gets reviewed randomly by faget mod A, faget mod B, faget mod C, etc.
So rather than some cabal-driven agenda against AI art it's more likely that there's just a small group with a stick up their ass for whatever reason, probably annoyed that there's a thread with /vg/ grade activity and schizophrenia on a podunk board like /h/(which isn't exactly the most "friendly" board to review in the first place).
>>359
Miku isn't exactly known for being the most developed girl. She's still ubiquitous enough though that if she doesn't look like an outright toddler it's pretty hard to catch a ban for her though.
And the "delete all" nuclear option is still fucking bizarre to me. It doesn't communicate anything to anyone and makes it seem more like it's petty bullshit than anything else.
Replies: >>361 >>364 >>369
>>360
>leave the unconcealed and disruptive spam untouched
>rangeban for reporting it
>leave the civitai acoslop shitposts untouched
>ban for a slight hint of a flatty/moe
>but only in ai threads
>this applies to both /e/ and /h/
yeah it could be not anti-ai but just general retardation that barely makes it better. literally everything they do makes threads worse. no moderation would be better. adequate moderation would be better.
and it's true, I don't really have resources and motivation to spam the place, pretty much all proxies and vpns I know of and cared to purchase are banned nowadays. 
but if someone like birdfag who's apparently got dozens of working proxies would wipe that whole shithole out I really, really wouldn't get sad over that happening
Replies: >>363 >>364
this is for backgroundfags still using pony

certain innate artists will completely destroy the background
for example (mjm, bedi:1.1) at the start of the prompt
https://files.catbox.moe/s8au9w.png
same image without any artists in the prompt:
https://files.catbox.moe/sb4pym.png
and then some innate artists will be a huge improvement
this is (kawakami rokkaku, fkey:1.1) at the start of the prompt
https://files.catbox.moe/hgc3ay.png
this is all using a landscape artist lora
seems like obvious information but i didn't expect the difference to be so extreme
>>361
higher traffic/schizophrenic thread=more visibility/reports 
a decentralized moderation approach to that means extremely uneven moderation
I'm absolutely not saying it's better, it's still really bad. I'm just saying that it's not the best idea to attribute to (pointed) malice what can be attributed instead to stupidity/ignorance/malicious compliance/apathy.
even in my case where it certainly *feels* like someone has a raging hateboner for me, specifically, could very easily be a case of getting caught in weird mass reports and there being an actual log of bans, someone reviewing it going "hrm this IP address has had a lot of bans on it in the past for lolicon, so this report must be true" and just handwaving the ban without really reviewing because the report was from /h/ and they don't want to actually look at porn but they're still forced to see the report ticket in queue.
(though interactions on /e/ do support that there's a janny that has something personal for me for whatever reason but that's not the point)
>but if someone like birdfag who's apparently got dozens of working proxies would wipe that whole shithole out I really, really wouldn't get sad over that happening
I mean, I wouldn't lament it so long as it was fair, equal and not centralized to hdg. Would still be pretty annoying though since it'd be an involuntary vacation just like a random retarded ban.
Replies: >>366
>>360
>This is almost definitely more of a board administration structuring issue than anything else. I doubt there are many(if any) dedicated /h/ janitors/moderators.
Why don't they open applications then? There are absolutely zero reasons not to open janitor applications. Maybe they are not doing that cause the board admin or mod or whatever is an unironical anti-ai artfag, but what other explanations are there outside of them simply not giving a slightest fuck? It really sounds like it's some /ic/ trannitor trying to powertrip there. What's the length of your ban, anyway? I think I've never seen anyone getting an extended vacation beyond 3 days.
>And realistically
You should be buying proxies in bulk from a bit shadier places, then guroposting in a way that won't let them know you're somehow different from a regular poster with a fresh browser.
>dynamic IP
Even if you have one, they still have an option to rangeban you. Sometimes your ISP may issue you a different subnet though. They also can easily track you via cookies and cloudflare.
If we become annoying enough while simultaneously being semi-invincible to the regular moderation tools, it would be plenty enough to be noticed by some higher up admin.

This likely won't be required if we limit ourselves with reposting groids to other threads and maybe /ic/, but that would be quite a bit more risky.

>So all you'll accomplish is becoming a schizophrenic autist that wastes their time trying to make things worse for other people for no real perceptible reason.
That's only the case if no one will actually do anything except you which is unlikely at this point. Anons only need the means.

Remember, anons moving out from /hdg/ is the main goal of the groidspammer. If we don't do anything now, which is not much at all, /hdg/ will without a doubt meet it's imminent demise for such a fucking stupid reason. We'll never know the outcome until we try either and giving up from the get go is such a fucking stupid move. So far the only thing we apparently tried is the moderation feedback form and regular reports, but there are also admin emails.
>>361
>but only in ai threads
>yeah it could be not anti-ai
Huh? What did I miss there?
Replies: >>365
>>364
>Huh? What did I miss there?
that it could be someone mass-reporting pics in ai threads, but not doing so anywhere else
Replies: >>366
>>365
That makes sense, but there's just no way they don't know there is a problem given the fact that there are mass reports and moderation feedback being filled with complaints.
>>363
If someone higher up is aware yet still deliberately chooses to stay ignorant while leaving groidspam untouched despite the reports, this isn't much different from being malicious.
Replies: >>367
>>366
bold of you to assume moderation feedback goes anywhere other than directly into the trash.
Also I doubt the moderation staff are a monolith. It's possible this is all caused by a single complicit mod and a janny cohort(by reviewing and dismissing valid reports). It's also possible they're permanently understaffed and can't gather enough fucks to care(and aren't actually really fully "aware" of what's going on). And who can blame them, they're doing it for free, after all.

The easiest way to try and get anything done about it would be to go directly to IRC to try and bitch to someone personally.
I refuse to do it but it seems like that would be the easiest and most direct way of making sure someone has even a vague idea of what's going on. After that it can be guessed at/decided how much of this is malice or not.
Replies: >>368
>>367
>go directly to IRC to try and bitch to someone personally
I don't think they communicate over anything other than discord nowadays.
Replies: >>369
>>360
>also it appears they nuked all my shit in the two other prior threads, though it seemed to only just recently-ish happen? Pretty weird.
And later still, all my posts in thread 602 also got nuked right before it got archived? And I'm pretty sure it had to have happened, sequentially, much later just because the other threads had the image cap backfilled by someone spamming 1.5 gens.
This shit is fucking bizarre and really does make it feel like some weird, one-sided petty obsession. Also feels weird since I hadn't been hit with a ban from /h/ for a pretty good minute and even the global ban I got was a month ago so it came out of fucking nowhere.
>>368
I mean, they still link to #[email protected] on the actual site and it's still listed at the bottom of the boardlist if you still use frames. I'd expect it to at least have someone still there - and being that it's IRC it's also probably less likely to be some vindictive ass zoomer grade retard.
Replies: >>370
>>369
>weird, one-sided petty obsession
what other explanation is there for your posts getting deleted off /e/ for being too western and that asuka ban on top of everything that's happening in /h/?
you seem to be consistent in your writing style, and your images are easily recognizable. this is just a passive observation from someone who doesn't care about imageboard personalities or drama. if i notice this, then others likely do too, and you must have pissed someone off since you often come across as a raging sperg, though that doesn’t justify any of this
there's a possibility that someone is taking advantage of the fact that you're one of the more active regulars, making you easy to identify, and is mass reporting every single one of your images across multiple threads. however, i don't remember this happening to others in the same way, so this doesn't seem plausible
Replies: >>371
>>370
a mod/janny having some weird personal obsession over me is one thing but I'd consider the thread state as another. They might be temporally related but more in the "a single mod is fucking around and intentionally clearing reports to prevent anything being done" kind of way than some cabal conspiracy of making the thread shit to make it shit as a site-wide policy.
And I feel like whoever it is that's obsessed with me is some weird discord group that tries to use the thread as their personal shitting grounds/lolcow farm and they probably have a janny who commiserates or something. I think a lot of this started happening after I made a tinfoil post mentioning an observation that there absolutely seemed to be some weird organized group that would intentionally give incorrect/bad advice to absolutely everything that they could. Everything from trying to hand out really shitty settings for just about everything to just outright shitpost tier misinformation like the retarded refiner shit. And I guess pointing that out painted a target on me, or something.
Also now archiveofsins stuff is getting taken down for whatever reason, which further screams third party schizophrenia since it probably involved emailing fake copyright notices.
Replies: >>372
>>371
>weird discord group
would they really contain themselves to a single general? you could go around other AI generals and ask if they had similar experiences i suppose
>shitpost tier misinformation
i remember thinly veiled attempts at trolling that came across as, 'this person has clearly never touched any kind of ai technology in their life,' yet they seemingly did their best to sound genuine and passionate. all of this could just be shitposters copying each other's behavior, who knows
>painted a target on me
i can think of another thing that painted a target on you. you've complained about bullshit bans quite often, so it could be that this gave someone the idea to fuck with you by occasionally reporting most of your posts. if the ban log you mentioned is real, that would add up. again, not blaming you. it just makes sense since your posts are easily recognizable
>third party schizophrenia since it probably involved emailing fake copyright notices.
/h/ threads were inexplicably nuked in the past, in the same manner i remember an /e/ general got nuked and the OP said it was some sort of bullshit copyright claim, seems like no one ever checks the validity of those things

i've remembered an instance of janny deleting blacked spam, can you believe that?
https://archived.moe/h/thread/7814145/#8055808
for some reason half of the blacked posts were untouched but half of them were deleted, alongside the racist posts, naturally. guess the report for off topic works if there's enough people reporting? i don't know how that would apply to hdg since technically they're not offtopic, but jannies don't seem to care either way so someone's unlimited ip works might be better utilized for mass reporting the spammer rather than decimating the entire board with gore. either way this tells me that moderation might be more incompetent than malicious, but unless someone talks to them we'll never know

anyway current spammer might be the same person that spammed /edg/ since they both have the pass
Replies: >>464
00006-43807781finalized.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1088x1328)
00007-644557641.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1080x1640)
00028-3707867968_copy.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1152x1632)
00117-1507525165_copy.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1152x1632)
>would they really contain themselves to a single general?
Who said they did? It existed before it but it kicked into overdrive after naiv3 released and AIDS leaked over.
The sort of threadshitting we see on hdg isn't really uncommon in /vg/ for the slower generals. There's a very real chance the activity cranked up just because they got backlinked over and saw the opportunity when console war bullshit was kicking in.
>you've complained about bullshit bans quite often
I've only complained about bullshit bans more "recently" but I started catching weird bans for a while. Actually looking through screencaps it seemed to have started in... December. You know, a month after naiv3 hit.
https://files.catbox.moe/0wh8ys.png
and then followed through in january
https://files.catbox.moe/3s71vs.png
one of the really weird ones was involving this conversation with someone who was obviously a janny trying to rile shit on /e/ https://files.catbox.moe/ey21t4.png
(note which side of the conversation got a free pass to being "off-topic")
and if I really want to put on a tinfoil hat, it feels like my situation very specifically involves a janny doing a lot of weird shit. I say janny because I feel like they're having to poke a mod to carry through on some of these actions and don't want to go overboard and do it too often to cause suspicion.
two other random bans
https://files.catbox.moe/hlees6.png
https://files.catbox.moe/m8xr9r.png
Also I don't think I'm entirely "unique" in getting singled out by whatever this group? random ass schizo? or whatever. If you notice there's been a lot of shitposting targeting the one guy that posts hyper vanilla with  tianlingdingdongwinwang in their mix just because they're fairly recognizable. There was also the shitposting against the luckystarfag, who, really, didn't do himself any favors with their posting style - but still didn't really *do* anything to warrant it. I've just ended up getting hit fairly hard because I prefer girls to be fun-sized and that's easier to write off as "look it's underaged!"

>seems like no one ever checks the validity of those things
Generally speaking they mostly don't. I'm guessing the aos thread was hit because it had miku as the OP and that's an easy enough IP to write a false takedown for.
>i've remembered an instance of janny deleting blacked spam, can you believe that?
iirc there were maybe 3? or so threads that actually had shit pruned from it. The thing is, I don't think it happened until someone went to IRC to bitch about it.
because while this shit is obvious to anyone with a functioning pair of eyes it's also really easy to write off out of context piecemeal as "why the fuck are you reporting this it doesn't break any rules."
>either way this tells me that moderation might be more incompetent than malicious
I think it's a mix of incompetence/apathy and a bad actor or two working to keep it that way.
Realistically if moderation, as a whole, really wanted AI art gone they'd just ban it site-wide or banish it purely to trash. They'd implement a new report category and be done with it and they wouldn't have to care. And there wouldn't really be much anyone could do about it, since a large part of hdg's posting doesn't actually have a real "home" without the thread, anyway, since a lot of it is nondescript animu girl with erratic and inconsistent subject matter. And the vast majority of it sticks out like a sore fucking thumb.
Replies: >>374 >>386 >>414
>>373
>Who said they did? It existed before it but it kicked into overdrive after naiv3 released and AIDS leaked over.
I always felt like that general started going downhill poster-quality wise somewhere around NAI release. Not because I hate NAI, but because it seemingly attracted shitposter mouth breathers from /vg/ that brought a lot of flamewar and bait patterns along with them.
>who, really, didn't do himself any favors with their posting style
Let's be honest, you didn't either. 
I feel like it's some schizofaggot who enters some sort of love-hate relationship with recognizable posters and interacts with them that way. I doubt it's discordfag group messing with recognizable anons
Replies: >>376
>>374
>Let's be honest, you didn't either. 
In my defense, while I'm generally abrasive I am nothing if not sincere and will usually go out of my way to fully explain things and provide any lora's/whatever involved if I need to.
>I feel like it's some schizofaggot who enters some sort of love-hate relationship with recognizable posters and interacts with them that way. I doubt it's discordfag group messing with recognizable anons
Being a single person doesn't really make sense. While I haven't been involved in them personally I know someone who's followed a lot of lolcow farm type groups in the past and this sort of shit really matches their behaviors. 
And that *certain* things seem to get hit with mass reports and you'll occasionally have clusters of 2-4 posts saying, effectively, the same thing but "different" implies it's someone actively backlinking it in a group.
I mean, it could be a single deranged autist that really streamlined their workflow on doing this shit but it feels like it makes more sense to be an organized group. And if you're familiar with chink "anti" groups this is also the type of behavior they engage in extremely heavily.

as an aside, man, it really doesn't feel that bad to be on a forced vacation from /h/ right now, anyway. Shitpost BLACKED thread is still up, there's a second LDG shitpost thread and there's one "real" thread that's being ignored.
It's a fucking shitshow.
>Realistically if moderation, as a whole, really wanted AI art gone they'd just ban it site-wide or banish it purely to trash. They'd implement a new report category and be done with it and they wouldn't have to care. And there wouldn't really be much anyone could do about it, since a large part of hdg's posting doesn't actually have a real "home" without the thread, anyway, since a lot of it is nondescript animu girl with erratic and inconsistent subject matter. And the vast majority of it sticks out like a sore fucking thumb.
Well you have one here, so get to posting boys.
00009-2967847121_copy.png
[Hide] (1.8MB, 1152x1632)
>Well you have one here, so get to posting boys.
断る。
Replies: >>379 >>380
38b21b9e0e18cb9b93220775fa7ed148566ccd583429938578eb3cb32727b3e8.png
[Hide] (150.7KB, 1231x508)
>>378
Are you sure about that
00034-1106945952.png
[Hide] (5.1MB, 2048x2048)
>>378
>so he says as he does it anyway
Replies: >>381
>>380
Spoilers, I did nothing.
00000-2519231436_copy.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1152x1632)
00104-3942736230_copy.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1152x1632)
00065-1488749645_copy.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1152x1632)
look, I just happened to have been working on something that fit the tone of the refusal. it can't be helped.
バーバカ。

unrelated but maybe trying to build out a synthetic dataset to flesh out this style might be a bit of a mistake. I mean, it's really easy to mask stuff that's redrawn into it since it's a really flat digital sketch style but it's also giving me a lot of the standard AI schizophrenic line shit and that's a royal bitch to pay attention to to correct and I feel like it's going to end up just creating a real bad feedback loop in training.
Replies: >>383 >>384
>>382
Keep it my guy, if not refine it a bit to keep it under control, but don't lose what makes it unique.
Replies: >>385
>>382
My tsun-sensor went off before i even got to the moonrunes
>synthetic dataset
that makes me wonder, has any artist started offering dataset comms? although the overlap between those who train loras and those who pay for art is likely minimal, if not nonexistent
Replies: >>385
>>383
It'll get done regardless it's just a pain having to really look for weird shit to try and prevent it from creating the feedback loop I don't want.
>>384
I remember there being some guy on hdg fucking ages ago talking about doing commissions for a character so they could do a lora off of them but don't really remember too much of what happened with them.
and honestly I don't even know what a real "ideal dataset" an artist could try to offer would be. Most the time just them having a fantia/fanbox/whatever is enough to build a proper dataset from and you don't really need *that* many images to do something semi-effective(the digital sketch style I've been doing was trained on only 6(!) images, 4 of which had to be upscaled, even).
tbh if an artist really wanted to get into the dataset game they'd be better off trying to sell access to the lora's themselves. At least then they can claim some sort of moral ground of "don't train on my shit just pay me for my work, instead."
{{kyokucho,_artist_deadnooodles,_kincora}},_loli,_blonde_hair,_green_eyes,_mediu_s-385327120.png
[Hide] (2.1MB, 1856x1280)
{{kyokucho,_deadnooodles,_kincora}},_messy_hair,_twintails,_purple_hair,_purple_s-629723001.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1280x1856)
st._louis_(azur_lane),_{{kyokucho,_deadnooodles,_kincora}},_nsfw,_nude,_white_th_s-1262307264.png
[Hide] (2.5MB, 1280x1856)
gotoh_hitori,_{{kyokucho,_deadnooodles,_kincora}},_medium_breasts,_[wide_hips],_s-2446406814.png
[Hide] (2.3MB, 1856x1280)
>>373
>If you notice there's been a lot of shitposting targeting the one guy that posts hyper vanilla with  tianlingdingdongwinwang in their mix just because they're fairly recognizable

Ngl having your own schizo it's really fun, I do think he is mad at me because I interact with the /vtai/ baker but that's been the case since many months, I must clarify that we are not friends or anything, he just happen to like some things I also like, one of them being vtuber sluts so there's that but yeah, things are dogshit right now on /hdg/ and /edg/, I keep posting out of habit but we clearly got new shitposters/schizos actively shitting both threads
Replies: >>390
H-hello?
Replies: >>388
>>387
Hewwo UwU
00015-1722516436_copy.png
[Hide] (2MB, 1152x1632)
00010-4604182.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1152x1632)
>we are now at 5 threads
as expected of shitposters, I suppose.
here I was hoping a mod would have noticed this shit already before my ban was up but I see I had set my expectations a bit too high.
Replies: >>390
00019-3949249710_copy.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1152x1632)
>>389
oh correction. one of them got nuked. that's progress, at least.
>>386
/e/ actually seemed to have settled down, outside of some really heavy levels of /aco/ spam. "Satellite" and the current era BLACKED spammer probably are the same person, if only because it seems they can only focus on one thing at any one time.
Replies: >>394
my miqo art project is still up
either i didn't got any reports because of the subject or jannies are sending very clear message 
sorry about that, i'm not responsible for any other spam, neither i plan to do this in the future
Replies: >>394 >>395
2446d092d09de6d95eb10296e6a07cc862dbba6a6b91126ee22e497442424c5e.png
[Hide] (32.5KB, 794x191)
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (1.8MB, 1224x1224)
I guess we aren't allowed to have fun at all, are we? If anyone can repost this, please do since changing ip is too much of a bother.
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/8205670#p8205670 is still up
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/8209050#p8209050 is still up
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/8210308#p8210308 is still up
Mine gets deleted for a bullshit reason (likely false reports) alongside a vacation. Take it as you want.
Replies: >>394
00022-2658788126_copy.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1152x1632)
>>390
>had to redo this to post to /e/ since I figured the flattie version ran too high of a risk of catching me a global even though it shouldn't
smh literally (figuratively) 1984 (not really)
>>393
is it really a false report at that point?
and it was after the second BLACKED thread got nuked so you probably got hit by the same mod.
It's uneven and nonsensical moderation, sure, but it's still technically valid moderation.
>>391
probably a mixture of timeframe posted and that it has a different naming scheme that it just slipped through or something. it's a mystery.
Replies: >>396 >>399
>>391
>neither i plan to do this in the future
Please do continue. It either gets worse before it gets better or it fucking dies. Trying to drag out the miserable nu-hdg as it is now is just painful to watch.
Replies: >>399 >>412
>>394
>is it really a false report at that point?
More like mass groidreport but yeah, not entirely false (the reason is still total bullshit though)
>and it was after the second BLACKED thread got nuked
It was archived, not nuked. So tiresome.
Replies: >>397
00027-2658788126_copy.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 1152x1632)
>>396
>It was archived, not nuked. So tiresome
oh you're right. that's actually pretty weird/retarded.
>/bhdg/ Blacked Hentai Diffusion General #1
>>394
well some non-loli flattie got deleted and was posted in the same time as my petty protest 
i know that you don't want to believe in some "conspiracy theories" but really, do sane people work for free in such shithole?
>>395
i will not, my only wish is to have place actually about hentai, not some repulsive mockery of it
spam will not change anything, i did this just out of spite
Replies: >>401 >>402
>somehow occasionally manage to just miss backlinking
fucking weird.

>>399
>i know that you don't want to believe in some "conspiracy theories" but really, do sane people work for free in such shithole?
It's less that and more that I don't want to attribute more credit than they deserve. There probably is someone greasing the gears and fudging things around for their dopamine kick but I don't think it's anything largescale or grand.
Like I said, if it was the general moderation consensus to be anti-AI they'd push it all into trash and/or /b/ and allow it nowhere else.

actually now that I think about it, there was that one weird danbooru poweruser clique shitfit that went on pushing anti-AI shit a while back. I don't really remember any of the ultimate details other than they were loosely "organized" and did some stupid shit. Wouldn't really be too surprising if there wasn't some sort of overlap going on there.
Replies: >>404
>>399
>i will not, my only wish is to have place actually about hentai, not some repulsive mockery of it
Do you think this is ever going to happen?
Jannies send a very clear message that they don't want this. You can spam all the low-quality melted niggerslop and fat miqote nightmare fuel and it's still more on-topic on nu-/hdg/ than a girl with a flat chest. You'll get called a pedophile and banned for questioning this, and reporting the spam will result in a ban too.
What's wrong with shitting up this mockery of a hentai board purely out of spite?
Replies: >>404 >>407 >>412
c2bc19012f5c5a34bd0d8fce74d927b3d094be14e0f8f3d6e84f4dcd7ef31023.png
[Hide] (8.1KB, 186x280)
who out of them should i pester about /h/ and what exactly should i say?
Replies: >>407
>>401
i agree with you about moderation not being the biggest problem
it's about the users that just can't respect the fact that /h/ is about certain artstyle direction
even in normal threads actually anime artstyles are only handfull, and jannies never bother to move shit to their designated boards
well, kinda surprising conclusion from this is how actually unpopular anime artstyle is
>>402
>Do you think this is ever going to happen?
no, that's why i don't want to bother
you can grab miqomix and do it yourself
Replies: >>407 >>411
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/8211535#p8211632
Replies: >>406
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (5.7KB, 519x79)
>>405
>it's real
baste
>>402
>What's wrong with shitting up this mockery of a hentai board purely out of spite?
Mostly that it's just weird autism and a waste of time for everyone involved.
If it's going to shit it's going to go to shit with or without your help. And dedicating time to make it worse doesn't really do anything other than, well, make it worse and waste your time.
>>403
honestly I'd just post in the regular channel and say that someone is spamming/shitting up a thread on /h/ by reposing low quality BLACKED porn, intentionally trying to rile the thread and have been at it for three days now. And if any individual mod responds mention that there's also been really weird/bizarre moderation behaviors and that if their are tools available to do so and they've got any free time and the will to do so they should review moderation actions taken on /h/.
maybe also offer to expound a schizophrenic account from your own point of view if they're further interested.
Though I wouldn't really expect all that much.
>>404
some amount of /aco/ does actually end up getting removed. Not a whole lot, but some does.
Either way the big issue with /aco/ isn't even necessarily that it's /aco/ on /h/. I mean, yeah that's an issue and it's off-topic, but it's also just unnecessary congregation. There's two aco threads. By posting to /h/ they're just dooming the thread they're better suited to be posting in. 
Of course, if there were an NSFW AI board this could all be solved for the most part but that would also open up a whole slew of other issues and probably require a lot more effort for moderation than anyone is actually willing to put into it.
Replies: >>408
>>407
>Of course, if there were an NSFW AI board this could all be solved for the most part but that would also open up a whole slew of other issues and probably require a lot more effort for moderation than anyone is actually willing to put into it.
...You're already posting in one.
Replies: >>409
>>408
with a whole seven users(according to the ticker on the root board page)
This is basically just a psuedo-anonymous discord channel that won't be taken down for loli.
Replies: >>410
>>409
Not the point, it just needs more shilling. We all know how to do that like adding the URL in the image or hiding it in the catbox metadata.
Replies: >>414
>>404
>i agree with you about moderation not being the biggest problem
Yeah it is. Literally all hdg issues are caused by moderation. A couple of acosloppers in hdg were never a big issue before mods started acting like a bunch of niggers.
Replies: >>412 >>413
>>395
>everything is shit but I encourage shitposting
I don't understand this doomer shit, if that was my mentality I'd leave and never come back

>>402
Where's that janny message, care to point me towards it? Or is it nothing more than your assumption based on what does and doesn't get deleted? Hypothetically, what do you think takes priority when things get reported, off topic/trolling/low quality or loli/shota outside of /b/? This is part of a bigger problem which is retarded rules of /h/, like treating toddlercon and petite girls as one and the same

>>411
I started posting in hdg around february last year after lurking there for a little while, even then I remember people mentioning that posting flatties risks you getting jannied, seeing people talk about it is the reason I've avoided posting girls that can be confused for lolis and I've never been banned or warned for any image I posted while other anons did get occasional bans or deletions even with images that weren't straight up loli. This tells me that moderation behavior was relatively the same, what changed is that we acquired a schizo with the ability to mass report posts, which merely brought the janny/mod incompetence to light

Are jannies retarded? Sure, but that's not the only issue, someone is constantly mass reporting posts and they don't seem to care. I wouldn't be surprised if they had some sort of guideline that stated "if the image reported as loli/shota can be confused for one off a thumbnail better stay on the safe side and remove it" 

If you actually look around /h/ as a whole there's quite a few petite and loli looking girls and there always have been, the difference is that no one is reporting them, and if someone ever reports an image or two it's rare enough for people to not care
Replies: >>414
>>411
moderation is the catalyst in case of off-topic, among other things, but fact that threads are filled with honest jeetslop by blind retards is the separate issue
for me the latter is the bigger problem as there is no escape from them
00042-1623684740_copy.png
[Hide] (1.8MB, 1152x1632)
>>410
shilling does nothing if the board is still dead. The last 72 hours has given this place the most activity it's seen since when it first went online and it's primarily because this situation really did go to shit pretty bad.
unironically you'd be better served posting more high(er) quality/diverse stuff here than trying to guerilla shill it.
>>412
>I started posting in hdg around february last year after lurking there for a little while, even then I remember people mentioning that posting flatties risks you getting jannied
That behavior didn't really start until after november/december-ish(see >>373 )
Pretty much anything I posted prior would absolutely net me a ban now. 
And the big issue is that it's just inconsistent as fuck. Completely separate megumin/nagatoro thread on /h/? Sure thing no problem. Post it in hdg, even with slightly upsized breasts? Enjoy your dice roll on deciding if you'll catch a ban or not.
There just isn't a defined line in the sand even though there's one that would be really easy to make(read: hold bans only for toddler shit). 

Hell, even in the thread that I was banned in for a, supposed, loli miku, there's actually multiple posts still up with significantly younger looking girls. Where and how did miku cross the line there that those aren't?
Replies: >>420 >>483
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (140KB, 1701x479)
Replies: >>416 >>419 >>420
>>415
should probably be noted that the person spamming things isn't actually spamming _their_ gens. They're just pulling from an off-site gallery(kemono/civit/whatever) and spamming (nearly) identical images in sequence.
Which is a big problem considering *spirit* of the thread is that we're autists pretending to be artists and it should be restricted purely to posting our own work.
Replies: >>417 >>418 >>420
>>416
I did mention it in IRC prior to mod contacting me.
Replies: >>418
>>416
>>417
I think it's pretty much confirmed that the meltdown due to highligherfag right? He keeps adding  shit like "Thread Highlights" to his posts
Replies: >>422
>>415
"local only" got archived, didn't got my ban for miqo though  
it seems that something is finally happening
>>414
>That behavior didn't really start until after november/december-ish
I wasn't talking about the extreme behavior that did start around that time, my point was that the signs were there all along it's just that barely anyone reported anything most of the time

>Hell, even in the thread that I was banned in for a, supposed, loli miku, there's actually multiple posts still up with significantly younger looking girls. Where and how did miku cross the line there that those aren't?
That's kind of what I meant too, your post(s) got reported, it'd be safe to assume that theirs didn't, or that there is indeed some sort of "ban log" which made the janny/mod nuke your shit without even properly looking at it

>>415
I appreciate you actually trying to talk to them although I've no idea what to make of that, they seem to be kind of cooperative but at the same time not really. Maybe if the mod actually looked at the state of the thread they'd get a better idea of what you're talking about
>i_love_fat_hags
based

>>416
If someone was to spam the same image with shitty small alterations the janny would probably would not have a problem recognizing it as flooding, AI makes it too easy to have more varied images especially when you can just scrap one of the gorillion galleries
Replies: >>421 >>422
>>420
>based
I'm sorry to disappoint anon, but my nickname may not be very sincere...
Replies: >>430
>>418
highlightfag is more or less a shitposter in their own right. Left unattended their goal seems to be to encourage low quality garbage while giving "nods" to more frequent posters to provide a form of plausible deniability. And, well, in the case of /h/ which is actively hostile to it it does its own job of partially derailing the thread anyway.
And any bitching about it on /e/ was met very swiftly with 3+ posts calling the person a nogen/"I'm sure you'll make it next time bro"/sour grapes/etc. type bullshit. It was all very territorially policed. Whether it was by them or a secondary shitposting doesn't make much difference when they didn't actually attempt to change their behaviors at all.
>>420
>I wasn't talking about the extreme behavior that did start around that time
I mean, the suggestions for not posting flatties came around specifically because of the relatively new behavior, is what I'm saying. pre-naiv3 you could post washboards to your hearts content and be fine as long as it didn't look like a toddler and there wasn't really any discouragement from doing so.
>or that there is indeed some sort of "ban log" which made the janny/mod nuke your shit without even properly looking at it
Honestly I've got no idea what kind of ban tools they have, it's just something that could "make sense" and provide plausible deniability. Though I do remember what paid level vbulletin admin panels from 20 years ago looked like and they absolutely had full depth suspension logs along with IP tracking along with comments/reasons for moderation action, so I wouldn't really be surprised if such a thing existed for futaba, as well.
>If someone was to spam the same image with shitty small alterations the janny would probably would not have a problem recognizing it as flooding
I wouldn't be so confident in this assumption. 
the satellite spam on /e/ more or less corroborates as much.
Replies: >>430
So tree got his dying wish and this place is now the new /hdg/?
Replies: >>428
they still did nothing aside from deleting shitpost threads
Replies: >>425
>>424
I wouldn't really expect it. The response I got from mod is probably more to the tune of "okay okay bro no need to shout so loud all over our nice channel, we'll look into it" but it's probably just going to end up being dismissed.
Replies: >>429
I actually think highlightertard is mostly genuine in his posting, just extremely autistic and has bad taste.
Replies: >>428 >>430
>>423
i'd leave this place asap when and if mods shove spammer's enormous black penis his own ass but i will never post my gens here
>>427
doing this will make the thread a closed off circlejerk shithole so the intention doesn't matter
Replies: >>430 >>431
>>425
idk, after last mass shitposting they started deleting all those "pedo chuddie" posts
the same thread shitter was doing this every day for months and after meltdown they finally started acting
so i can only hope they will start to moderate things when they notice it
Replies: >>430
>>421
I just found it hilarious that this was your chosen nickname for chatting with the mods, quite fitting

>>422
highlights have been part of /e/ for a good while, and attacking them rather than trying to have a constructive conversation with the highlighter directly is bound to elicit that kind of response, don't you think? my feelings towards highlights were always neutral but I can see why people would be defensive
>the suggestions for not posting flatties came around specifically because of the relatively new behavior, is what I'm saying. pre-naiv3 you could post washboards to your hearts content and be fine as long as it didn't look like a toddler and there wasn't really any discouragement from doing so.
yeah well that's the weird thing, I know that the reason I did not post any is because I saw anons talking about it back in winter-spring last year. Is it possible I hallucinated that and my delusion shaped my style of posting? I was always diligently giving everyone at least a slight boob job, as much as I hated it, since I didn't want to deal with vacations. Perhaps I saw only a few posts of someone talking about getting banned and took them to heart, while you weren't there to see them or you just don't remember. I can't be arsed to look through archives
>the satellite spam on /e/ more or less corroborates as much.
what I meant was spamming the same image except with additional two lines there and there every time you post it in order to avoid the spam filter, you must have seen that happen across the website occasionally, well I did, and those posts were usually dealt with accordingly. kind of like the vidya butts spam, except that was an explicit image on a blue board and a whole other kind of schizo 

>>427
and you are right, he is absolutely genuine. if you noticed any of the things he says occasionally, his tolerance for AI errors and such is extremely high, and that's putting it lightly

>>428
>i will never post my gens here
weak

>>429
>they started deleting all those "pedo chuddie" posts
that's probably because I was reporting them, I usually report shitposts for low quality or off-topic, but I'm not in the thread 24/7 and sometimes these posts don't necessarily fit any report category
Replies: >>431
00049-1425454294_copy.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1152x1632)
>>428
>but i will never post my gens here
I don't really see why not, though. I'm only really here because the activity kicked up from the current shitstorm and because I'm banned, but since I'm here and posting to it I may as well do the polite thing and positively contribute.
>>430
original OP was more or less fine. He only highlighted 10-15 images a thread and they were generally error free.
Current highlighter went maximum autist and was doing, unironically, 25-40% of a threads images as highlights. He was also given pretty constructive criticism and did nothing with it.
It just became impossible to take them as anything other than a shitposter at that point.
>I did not post any is because I saw anons talking about it back in winter-spring last year
Last year as in 2023 or as in this past year 2024?
I only loosely paid attention in 2023 in like, may/june and then from august on but I don't remember any chatter on flatties being illegal. And I posted a lot of gaki-tier cutting boards through august/october and got nothing from it. There was certainly a lot of chatter of it from feb onward for 2024, but that's because there were a lot of abrupt bans for it through january.
Replies: >>432 >>434
>>431
>I don't really see why not, though
this website is run by furries
Replies: >>433 >>435
>>432
yeah that's fair
>>431
>25-40% of a threads images as highlights
yeah I honestly don't get that either
>He was also given pretty constructive criticism and did nothing with it
true, but I don't know if he really took it in as constructive, probably got mixed signals considering the extremely defensive reaction coming from multiple posters. I still don't think he's a shitposter and is genuinely trying to do a good thing but the road to hell is paved with good intentions and all that

>Last year as in 2023 or as in this past year 2024
winter-spring 2023
I think it got better towards summer as the threads slowed down
Replies: >>438
>>432
Man, do people really have such low tolerance for other people's fetishes
I really thought that "fat hag" and "aco" shit is just shitposting to make people annoyed and send a message
But I guess autists really are triggered when they see that something that doesn't align with their tastes
Replies: >>436 >>438
>>435
I think some people just hate furries. It seems that most people need to hate something in order to get by. As far as I'm concerned, as long as a person isn’t deranged, I couldn’t care less which group they belong to. If I see something I dislike and it isn’t egregiously breaking the rules, I just scroll past it.
Replies: >>437
>>436
A lot of furries are indeed hypocritical faggots like drhead but I try not to judge people by their fetishes. 
>As far as I'm concerned, as long as a person isn’t deranged, I couldn’t care less which group they belong to. If I see something I dislike and it isn’t egregiously breaking the rules, I just scroll past it.
yeah, same pretty much
>>434
>true, but I don't know if he really took it in as constructive, probably got mixed signals considering the extremely defensive reaction coming from multiple posters
if he fell for the errant shitposting he's not really any better than they are even if he is "genuine" about it.

>>435
hating furries is, innately, 4chinz culture.
I don't personally care about it but someone else mentioning it makes me immediately give a "understandable, have a nice day" response to it. It's just how things are.
hmm.jpg
[Hide] (2.7MB, 2048x2048)
it's_a_strap-on.jpg
[Hide] (2.1MB, 2048x2048)
hair.jpg
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1664x2432)
Replies: >>440
>>439
>hmm.jpg
how you did the background? img2img or some lora with off the wall prompt?
Replies: >>441
>>440
that one was done with nai and vibe transfer, i believe i used either one or both of these images for it
https://files.catbox.moe/0jphcq.png
https://files.catbox.moe/19bc98.png
i can't seem to find the original t2i gen, this is the closest i've found but there isn't special background wise
https://files.catbox.moe/148zj1.png
just "cube, geometry, occult, eldritch abomination, monster, disembodied eye, horror (theme), tendrils"
Replies: >>442
>>441
thanks
they still do nothing
I wonder if he will reach 300 by himself this time around.
i think respamming groidspam on other threads is the only solution
Replies: >>446
>>445
it will be instantly deleted and nothing will change on hdg
you'll just end up with range ban
Replies: >>447
>>446
let's end up with rangeban together
https://files.catbox.moe/do4blj.zip
Replies: >>448
>>447
at least pick one dumpster and spam there
but that's really naive, they will rather banish hdg from the board than do something about it 
and this time it actually seems to be some tranny clique action
Replies: >>449 >>450
>>448
>at least pick one dumpster and spam there
that would be unwise because the goal is to attract and annoy as many anons as possible
>they will rather banish hdg from the board than do something about it
Mods will not get rid of a containment thread unless they want all the schizos spreading out.
>>448
I don't necessarily think the posting itself comes from "a clique". It's really not hard to pull off by yourself, and cooldowns suggests it all comes from one poster.
But the mods ARE probably a clique, because they are united in not responding to reports.
Replies: >>451
>>450
i don't recall spam ever being this fast, sure it's most likely one person, but really fucking committed, unlike other ones 
in other cases those were attempts to derail thread, but now there is no thread
ban.png
[Hide] (108.8KB, 1034x533)
ban2.png
[Hide] (113.8KB, 639x719)
Oh my god, seems like it IS spamming indeed. What a fucking surprise. So 10 images in a pixiv thread is spam, but 400 pictures in AI threads is fine. 
Really makes you think :)
>>452
i've seen, quite expected outcome
>>452
I've reported four images of the spammer in /hdg/, two in one thread and two in the newest one. Seems like they got deleted but everything else is fine? Am I the only one reporting them?
Replies: >>455 >>456
>>454
every time I try and report flooding like that one of three things happen.
1. Absolutely fucking nothing gets deleted and the reports went into a trashcan.
2. I catch a warning for abusing false reports and all of said reports still went into a trashcan.
3. I get a global ban for abusing false reports and all of said reports still went into a trashcan.

This is not a unique experience. It's not hard to believe that people have just been conditioned to no longer even bother reporting in the first place.
Replies: >>456 >>460
>>454
>>455
Can confirm this, previous time I tried to report the spammer I got a warning.
I ignored it and kept reporting, soon enough I got a range ban.
Few days ago I threw one report at Satellite on /e/ and got a 3 day global for false reporting. 

So yeah I no longer bother, but I guess I'll try doing this again next time.
>>452
that's why you were told *not* to spam, anon
1 pic per 3 hours is more than enough and it's still as annoying
Replies: >>458 >>459
>>457
Or rather, time is not really an important factor, but it's best if 1 browser page can only display 1 groidpic at a time.
>>457
That was more or less my purpose in doing this, checking if I'd get banned or not. It undeniably, beyond any doubt, confirms the mods' double standards. I'm still not sure how to proceed with this though. Either leaving the board for good or spamming /h/ to death both sound fair. 
Dropping 1 sorry-ass nigger once a few hours seems just completely futile to me though. Not annoying enough, not disruptive, at most people are gonna get confused by this, like maybe it's some shitter from AI or NTR general who clicked the wrong thread. I think you either commit to the autism or don't bother.
Replies: >>461
>>455
When I report shitposting it gets deleted half the time but often my reports are ignored, and I'm very anal about what I report, I make absolutely sure it fits the criteria of the report category
If your posts in that thread got reported by various people maybe that's what made the janny nuke them all? I still would like to think that jannies are terminally retarded rather than they have some agenda although what difference does that make at this point lol

Well there's something else we can try, if he continues to spam again, reply to all or most of his posts with something along the lines of "why are you chain posting 30 images of the same shit?", "janny this guy is flooding the thread again" etc. but only report no more than two images at a time and make sure the images you report look more or less the same as the other images above or below. 

The logic behind this is to make sure you indicate that this is spam if the janny needs to be spoonfed and make sure your posts calling out the spam aren't reportable for racism and that the samey nature of the images is easily identifiable to any retard who can't devote more than 3 seconds of his attention span to the state of the thread
Replies: >>463 >>465
>>459
Although after ilovefathag anon's irc visit they could change their approach. All troll threads archived, spammer might be banned.
Let's observe for now.
also here's another reason why I'm inclined to believe that jannies are just retarded. A few months ago someone made a thread in /h/ - the OP image was an underage looking girl with a logo censor advertising cheeze pizza telegram channel. I reported that under "This post violates United States law."
you know how long it took them to take that down? I made sure to check the time, over 40 fucking minutes. And it wasn't the first time I saw that image/ad pop up around the website either
There was also some guy posting one of those "modeling" images around /g/ occasionally. They somehow stayed up for quite a while more often than not and they weren't an ad either
Replies: >>463
>>460
>"janny this guy is flooding the thread again"
i got warns for posts like that, because that's complaining about moderation
>>462
aren't those just glownigger fakes?
Replies: >>464
>>463
>i got warns for posts like that, because that's complaining about moderation
amazing. suppose you can just drop the janny part and complain about the guy spamming instead, kind of like what the anons did in >>452 

>aren't those just glownigger fakes?
lets say glowies contact moderation and say they're running some honeypot operation. they're going let all the jannies know about it too?
>hey guys there's gonna be this uhh cheesy image, don't act on any reports it gets for a good while okay?
but I mean sure, maybe that's how it went. but that doesn't explain the /g/ dude since he came off as some sort of autistic schizo who hated the website or something like that, I don't see the benefit in letting his posts stay. my whole point is that at least to me the moderation seems extremely inconsistent as a whole, just like in that archived thread linked here
>>372
where half the blacked spam got deleted but half of it was allowed to stay. makes no fucking sense
>>460
reporting stuff as trolling outside of /b/ works about half the time, yeah. Well, probably not half, probably more like a quarter of the time, but it does work occasionally. Reporting spam/flooding just doesn't work at all from my experience. It feels like it's intended for people flooding advertising link shit or something.
And "just report one if you don't want banned ;^)" is such a stupid fucking position for administration to try and take. It doesn't make any fucking sense and I can't imagine would even be all that helpful for moderation since they'd need to manually review the thread to find out what the fuck the report is even about.
Also, schizo mass-backlinking will almost certainly get you hit with a warning or ban for offtopic/spamming(because spamming (you)'s... is a thing?)/whatever
>If your posts in that thread got reported by various people maybe that's what made the janny nuke them all?
The thing is if you looked at the posts I made that were deleted only one of them was actually 'questionable' enough to also be deleted. The "delete all" button is intended? for people like, well, the BLACKED spammer who floods a thread or for really notorious shitposters that do a lot of schizo shit.
and I don't think they, as a whole, have an agenda or anything. but there is probably one that has some weird obsession going on.
Replies: >>466
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (81.1KB, 976x209)
>>465
>It feels like it's intended for people flooding advertising link shit or something.
Well, this one certainly didn't post any advertising links or shit, but got banned for this exact reason. >>452

And, well, have a new screenshot. I'm nearly 100% sure that it's a tranny anti-ai janny acting in a bad faith, and mods just don't care to even look up the post when they see a ban request from /h/. None were given anything but 3-day vacations.
Replies: >>467
>>466
Could be a mod too but yeah I think it's undeniable that there's someone there with clear anti-ai bias there
Replies: >>468
>>467
I have a lot of doubt on it being anti-ai driven.
It's just a high activity thread on a board no one wants anything to do with because, well, it's just porn. And normally the only thing anyone should have to care about on a board for porn is standard shit like people posting csam(which doubles the aversion of anyone wanting to actually handle the board). But being a high activity thread it attracts the actual schizo's that shitpost endlessly on vg.
Either way, things are fairly calm for the moment outside of the standard console war baitposting shit. Though I'm guessing things will go a... direction when the gook model gets leaked or released.
Replies: >>469 >>477
>>468
>being a high activity thread it attracts the actual schizo's that shitpost endlessly on vg
hdg was linked several times in at least two generals on /vg/ that I know of
Replies: >>470
>>469
Yeah, which is kind of my point.
And those schizos are absolutely the type that would waste their time trying to get into being a janny purely to enhance their shitposting through whatever amount of 'power' they get.
though it could still be some assmad /ic/ loser. supposedly they're home to another really special breed of schizo and they like to single people out.
Either way, at the end of the day the "who" "what" and "why" is all pretty irrelevant. All that really matters is trying to find ways to circumvent/stem the shit where possible. Which, seemingly, going onto IRC and bitching in the open channel may have an amount of effectiveness if enough noise gets made.
Replies: >>473
of course though, not long after mentioning it being fairly quiet the spam started back up again
Replies: >>472
>>471
I reported two posts, maybe someone should try reporting two of the "box" posts with more similar looking images since the text is the same, lets see what happens
>>470
>Which, seemingly, going onto IRC and bitching in the open channel may have an amount of effectiveness if enough noise gets made.
They will be sending you to https://4chan.org/feedback over and over until they're bored of typing their usual excuses and ban you (on IRC) instead of doing something. And that IRC is about requesting unbans and le funny chatting anyway.
Replies: >>474
>>473
>And that IRC is about requesting unbans
I would assume going to IRC to beg for an unabn would just extend the one you were given.
And note, I'm not talking about trying to actually "solve" this weird issue. I'm talking more about just popping into IRC, giving a "hey can a mod handle someone someone spamming in <thread url>? if you have eyes and actually look it should be obvious, thanks" and then hitting the X button on the client and fucking off while refusing to elaborate.
Posting blatant and obvious issues in an open channel makes it harder for things to be ignored.
Replies: >>475 >>476
>>474
>I would assume going to IRC to beg for an unabn would just extend the one you were given.
I think they will unban you if the ban you're under is not yours for example or similar but there's also a huge chance of them turning into 4chan pass shills
>I'm talking more about just popping into IRC, giving a "hey can a mod handle someone someone spamming in <thread url>? if you have eyes and actually look it should be obvious, thanks" and then hitting the X button on the client and fucking off while refusing to elaborate.
There's already a schizo who assumed some discordtroons raided his beloved IRC just because multiple people complained about the shitposter at the same time. I'm expecting that place is not popular enough for randos to just walk in and drop some complaints trying to keep the cool at the same time.
>>474
>"hey can a mod handle someone someone spamming in <thread url>? if you have eyes and actually look it should be obvious, thanks"
This happens from time to time and the answer is that the channel is not for that, use report function and moderation feedback.
>>468
Is the gook model really that good broski?
don't give me hope
Replies: >>479
>now hdg is getting raided by some atf fags
hilarious
a2c96bc6-6a8d-4807-9ab9-3557df6333b7.png
[Hide] (893.4KB, 896x1152)
db298860-5393-4b4f-a698-b0e8ea7cc4d5.png
[Hide] (1MB, 896x1152)
cbf36135-d599-4711-942e-99ad5ad2f1c6.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 896x1152)
>>477
I only played with it for a bit while the huggingface demo was up and didn't think to actually save all the testing I did but it's really fucking competent. Though it has some real bad issue with forcing multiple views and also weird angles at the moment.
I also wouldn't count on any of the inherent artist knowledge. That part is pretty much a wash and pure fucking cope for the moment(though it should improve on later revisions, assuming any get released). But unlike arti you don't have to prompt in weird schizophrenic ways to get it to actually do things. 
Basically, it's actually a valid alternative to pony. Especially since it has pretty tangible character knowledge - once it's released I'd fully expect a lot of people to actually use it, unlike the other trash finetunes.
Should be noted though that all of image related are lowres with having to try and wrangle the (erratic) innate artist knowledge of the model and also had a forced NSFW in the negative prompt. Once it actually releases I'd expect outputs to be a fair bit more refined.
Replies: >>480
>>479
>I also wouldn't count on any of the inherent artist knowledge. That part is pretty much a wash and pure fucking cope for the moment(though it should improve on later revisions, assuming any get released)

> But unlike arti you don't have to prompt in weird schizophrenic ways to get it to actually do things. 
That's already a win lmao, alright, time to wait (again)
Replies: >>481
>>480
for reference, you can prompt it literally identically to pony, just with replacing the score tags with the dumb quality tags that it uses(the default list it includes is "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres").
this alone makes it more approachable than any other alternative model so far. Also again, didn't really test it too much but it seemed pretty receptive/fine with limited boomer prompts to try and guide direction with reinforcement tags added.
the more important part though is that this is all a fairly early-in-training model(from may or something). so assuming we get anything further it'll only improve from here.
Greetings, sirs, i thought we leaking anima model, yes?
d006707ce180d6baee9c0fb0be19349792e24f26f053d2d500ed05190c73be46.png
[Hide] (2.3MB, 1344x1792)
>>414
I was trying to recreationally ban bait posting after I didn't get banned for total cutting boards (groider-kun causing the thread with them to ne nuked could be the reason) by finding where in the sand the line with posting Homura pictures and this is what broke the camel's back, which I kinda expected. but unfortunately at the same time, I kinda fucked up my experiment with including the word "cunny" in my post, so I'm not sure if the image would've actually got me the hammer without such description
Anyways, gives me a vacation to test out gooknai with non-H stuff while I consider posting to pixiv again
Replies: >>484 >>485
>>483
bans are random,there is no particular line or pattern
last time shuuten anon was posting, most of his shit got deleted but two random images were left and archived
whoever is going through and bumping all the threads on /h/ gave me a good chuckle.

>>483
it's honestly extremely random. I've posted things before and then reposted them threads later for whatever reason and gotten a ban for it. And the randomness of it is what really makes it frustrating.
Upload the model. Or else.
ds.jpg
[Hide] (723.1KB, 2048x2048)
sc.jpg
[Hide] (705.4KB, 2048x2048)
s1.jpg
[Hide] (761.1KB, 1536x2688)
s2.jpg
[Hide] (561.6KB, 1536x2688)
ps.jpg
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1664x2432)
Replies: >>488
>>487
>tallflats
the most based and patrisian taste (because exactly like my)
3ad08e5cbcb9122aa2661bf3606af5e3fc888b3e1c82e117385d6607e14439f3.png
[Hide] (40KB, 786x291)
>tell someone posting hyper to go where they actually belong
>post gets deleted and received a warning
all of other obvious shitposting though? that's totally cool and allowed.
Replies: >>490 >>494
>>489
yes, it's weird that you got warn for that but another thing is that, you should know when to shut the fuck up
Janny must have ACCIDENTALLY clicked the wrong button!
So is this board just a refuge for the banned, or is there a reason to post here
Replies: >>493 >>499
>>492
I just post here whenever I have something that will most likely get me banned on /hdg/
Just don't expect (You)s, it's dead.
>>489
I don't know man, the dick looks huge compared to the handprint, but huge is far from hyper.

There's no single definition, but danbooru and r621 mostly agree on "comparable in length or girth to its owner's torso".

Also, /trash/ just because she has a tail and wings? There's not a single fur strand or scale on her human bits.
Replies: >>499
the meltdown over not being able to wait less than a week was kind of amazing
Replies: >>496 >>497 >>499
>>495
Wonder how much of that is just on principle. The /h/ board itself was built on sharing. Going along with an artists exclusivity demands, I can't remember even a single instance of that.
Replies: >>498 >>499
>>495
Just a week? Tree-kun might die in a week, you monster! We need to bring him this torch of hope, hope for local...
>>496
It's okay for ME to have exclusive access. But you should share yours.
00011-4289039581.png
[Hide] (896.1KB, 1152x1632)
>>492
so far it's more or less that, posting stuff that would get you banned otherwise and/or meta discussion with maybe an ounce more sincerity than you'd get on hdg.
>>494
nta but hyper has a really specific dick art style that overwrites pretty much everything. Also her tits are larger than her head and her ass is even larger.
>>495
pretty sure that's just the shitposter crew taking a ball and running with it since it's getting (you)'s and is easy to manufacture samefag posts for.
>>496
it's something with a stated release date. it's annoying but there really isn't a reason to get your panties in a bunch over it.
It'd be entirely different if it was something that was NDA'd "no one is allowed to get it ever without going through me" hoop jumping bullshit or if they ignore the slated release date. But since it isn't it's not worth caring too deeply about.
Replies: >>515
00020-1781082439.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1152x1632)
00035-1062495581.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1152x1632)
>model leaked anyway
in better news it's absolutely a lot better locally than it was on the shitty huggingface UI. AYS and actual, proper upscaling helps it a lot.
00062-76659476_copy.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1152x1632)
what the actual fuck
https://files.catbox.moe/d5ptii.png
>>501
if i were you i'd make a compilation of those and ask a mod what the fuck is happening. but yeah i know you don't want to go to their irc
Replies: >>504
>>501
you're recognisable so you have few dedicated reporters, and it's stylised enough for janny to just approve it 
yesterday i reported uncatboxxed aco shotacon from the same faggot as always and ofc janny don't care about that
Replies: >>504
>>503
I guess this is someone going way out of their way to announce that they're really pissed off that I'm lazy and leave "copy" in my filenames? As if it means anything?
>>502
I'm currently stuck in a training loop trying to figure out what the FUCK is going on with style training on the gook model(spoiler: things aren't going to plan) so it's not really a super huge deal it's just really fucking weird that someone can look at that breast to body ratio and go "ah. yes. that's a child."
Replies: >>506
>>504
Bro I feel you on the training, Cascade may have had a fucky wucky where I was inserting the wrong text embeddings. Fuck knows how it held together this long - not asking questions. However as penance for my fuck ups maybe SDXL in place of the biggun. Still working on theory atm.
Replies: >>507
>24 deletions 
well that's certainly interesting.
I wonder if that was my fault since I, against better judgement, submitted a mod feedback asking for them to review moderation activity on /h/ and specifically backlinked a catalog search for hdg. Though it was also right after the thread went full schizo after getting slid into page 11(this shit is still hilarious to me).

>>506
I think the big issue with the gook model right now is it's just that it's an early epoch. It's got a lot of incomplete and inconsistent tag inference built up to where some tags have excessive bleed and it can't even do anything 100% stylistically coherent across seeds, so any network you try and foist upon it to guide/control it just runs the risk of not being able to make heads or tails of things.
That said, if you wanted to do a full finetune, this is a really great model to start with. Like, it's SSS+ grade for it. It's just small datasets for artists that it doesn't know that are really wishy washy on if it'll learn it or not. For as shit as pony was for training, I could get it to do some real crazy shit.
Though, if the model DOES know the artist but it's not quite there yet? Make sure you tag the actual recognized artist tag in captions and a lora can take it the rest of the mile real easily. And it shouldn't be super difficult to do a good range of multiple artist all in the same lora.
There's also a lot of stupid shit I need to try but there may or may not still be things that need the design doc to really figure out.
Replies: >>509
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (113KB, 1041x346)
>>501
I also got hit what the fuck
Replies: >>510 >>512 >>516
>>507
Look after fucking around with Cascade I'm experimenting with Text Encoderless training where the CLIP models are untouched and should dramatically lower training requirements.

I'm also a clean house enjoyer, so a 6.4m finetune (e6 purged human cunny - so I emergency backed it all up ahead of time) will be built from the original checkpoint.

Experiments are going well if not having silly bugs like having the wrong aspect ratio.
>>501
>>508
Joining the team
Replies: >>511
Screenshot_2024-09-24_192017.png
[Hide] (502.6KB, 2303x930)
>>510
forgot my image kek
Replies: >>512 >>515 >>516
>>508
>>511
amazing moderation
Replies: >>513
>>512
I purposely sized up the breasts this time too. 
I thought it was the character but sailor moon is still up so I dunno. Guess it was percieved as cute = loli leading to jannie neuron activation
Replies: >>514
>>513
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/8167360
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/8183800
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/8211946
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/8169811
https://boards.4chan.org/h/thread/8167442
look at all the OP images
people post petite girls because no one is mass reporting them
jannies/mods are just retarded and they probably don't even look at the images with lots of reports at all
00016-2496422459.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1152x1632)
00010-374126238_copy.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1152x1632)
if anyone's interested in some lank on the new gook model here's an ao 6336 glora
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/dtvucjale4k36/
eyes can be a bit messy but does a pretty good job otherwise. I've been adding "muji \(uimss\), tsukumizu yuu" as artist calls and it seems to improve it a little. It can work fine on its own, though.
Style training on the model is still pretty nebulous at the moment, though.
also for reference, miku related is identical prompt to >>499 (which was done on pony) - except with small breasts instead of flat chest.


>>511
eh, homerun is a JC so it's not super out of character for an australian to be up in arms over it. Also she's still too flat, since, you know, even C cups aren't safe for whatever fucking reason.
the k-angel ban is a lot more dumb since she's canonically like, 19 or something? Though still not super surprising since she's not a D cup.
Replies: >>517
>>511
>>508
>>501
>3day bans for THOSE pics, 2 of the bans are global
It's just... I can't even... I just think even reddit and discord are gonna have less insane "loli" standards at this point. What the fuck is this?
Replies: >>517
00008-1798152764.png
[Hide] (4.5MB, 1792x2304)
00225-740287281.png
[Hide] (4.4MB, 1664x2432)
>>515
>>516
Yeah, insane. even more considering the past gens I posted of her before that one on the same thread and the last one but oh well, can't have good things on 4chinz nowadays
00130-2962690360.png
[Hide] (3.8MB, 1536x2688)
00230-1427186443.png
[Hide] (3.9MB, 1664x2432)
That tianlong ping pong lora really stabilized my mixes and outputs with illustrious, still struggling to get good looking dicks tho kek
I'm actually having fun slopping again
Replies: >>519
00026-1654049820.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1152x1632)
00070-721920112.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1632x1152)
00092-2414599101.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1152x1632)
>>518
if you're talking about the one posted to hdg, that shit is fried to fuck. Not that I have one worth uploading at the moment, but that one in particular is fried really bad.
And a lora in general should help stabilize regardless. A big issue is that the model is a bit unfocused, so forcing a unet on top of it that is very much individual subject focused is going to reign it in a lot.

Generally speaking though, even in its current state, gooknai actually completely obsoletes pony as far as I care. Which is kind of fucked up. It just does so much shit that pony cannot do, even when you hold a gun to its head. and I'm not sure I've found anything that pony *can* do that it can't. It also has so much more expressiveness and bodytype options. The only real detriment so far is that pony was significantly easier to train style lora's on.
Replies: >>520 >>521
>>519
>if you're talking about the one posted to hdg, that shit is fried to fuck
Yeah that one and I agree, illus even at his current messy state mogs pony for everything I really want to gen style and concept wise, feels fucking good to be free from pony hell
Replies: >>522
ComfyUI_01852_.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1152x1536)
ComfyUI_01859_.png
[Hide] (1.8MB, 1152x1536)
ComfyUI_01860_.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1152x1536)
ComfyUI_01862_.png
[Hide] (2MB, 1152x1536)
>>519
nice elainas, so glad the model understands her hair ornament and braid ribbons natively
Replies: >>522
00013-128447979.png
[Hide] (905.2KB, 1152x1632)
>>520
being able to get tiny, flat butts is a fucking godsend. Also I haven't had to redraw a single fucking ear so far and you have no idea how nice that feels. Eyebrows and such also take a significantly lower amount of work. It's great.
>>521
the absolute cutest dyke.
Replies: >>523 >>527
>>522
Well it looks like the leak did its damage, someone went and contacted the CEO and got the wrong eyeballs on the model
nothing ever happens
(this model is still a workable starting point, just rip what could've been)
Replies: >>525
00021-2310994516.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1152x1632)
00025-2359564131.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1152x1632)
>model knows shinoa
so many funsize characters to go through.

>>524
whatever happens, happens. and shitposting about it won't change anything.
also people calling bad faith actors, while it's definitely one of the more likely scenarios, it's also probably just as likely it could've been someone trying to get them to spin off the model to someone based in the US that doesn't need to heed korean laws. Or at least, the "no, I will plan and prepare" message posted sounds like it has potential for something along those lines.
(which, as hilarious and retarded as the prospect is, this could unironically have been someone like... astrafaget or someone from civit, the former since he probably has swaths of unused capacity and civit because it seems to absolutely align with their general interests)
00035-1727248553.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1152x1632)
oh boy. since I'm still banned I may as well post lora shit here.
as said previously, so far this model kind of really sucks for training. There's a few kind of dumb ways to go about things but it's definitely not as malleable as pony is. Also, as a secondary effect of that, I don't actually seem to be getting that huge of a benefit out of GLORA on this model. At least, not for the current method I'm choosing to train things, so I went back to oldschool 32dim locon(arguably I might be able to get dims even lower without much degradation but I didn't test that so it can't be helped).
All that said, here's my current working illustrious directory https://www.mediafire.com/folder/e9bd63vj786sf
All subdirectories have a preview grid in it. If it's an x/y grid it means that you need to tag the artist to activate it.
Yes, this sounds stupid and like a bit of a regression. And to a degree it kind of is but it also really isn't. The model _knows_ these artists. The knowledge it has is really incomplete but it absolutely knows them; so these are basically just micro-finetunes targeting that very specific artist and giving it a kick in the pants. Also these are all unet only trains with the TE disabled.

current artists done through this method so far
yamamoto souichirou
tsukumizu yuu
tianliang duohe fangdongye
kokaki mumose
kiato
ciloranko

I've also got a clean .toml for ezscripts for the current config  I'm rolling with in there if anyone wants that. Though this is all still very v1 and I'm just running with "safe" settings that don't seem like they'll completely fry out. Also designed for 12GB vram - though I think it fits in around 10GB usage or so. Step outputs to check for are probably going to be 154 and 132(though I'd also check 165 and 143).

Also further disclaimer that I honestly haven't tested these super thoroughly. Please to the understanding, I literally just ran a batch of 6 of them overnight. From what I can tell there might still be a few kinks to work out but that's kind of to be expected - it hasn't even been a week yet.
Replies: >>527 >>537
00327-553313497.png
[Hide] (4.4MB, 2688x1536)
00062-3273438652.png
[Hide] (3.9MB, 1664x2304)
>>522
Pony is fucking dead to me, I can almost 1:1 my NAI gens style and composition wise, still can see it's flaws, it goes crazy with anatomy more than It should but that's expected given all that we know about the model

>>526
>ciloranko lora preview actually has the ciloranko eyes
based, I'll test it later
Replies: >>528 >>530
>>527
>pony is dead to me
>posts two pony gens
Replies: >>529
>>528
>*sobs* *sniff*
00059-2053159235.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1152x1632)
>>527
> it goes crazy with anatomy more than It should
The seed RNG is really real but it's just not a big deal at all. the fact that I can do stupid shit like this without upscaling separate prompts/edits and then compositing is wild.
also catboxing these since they're not porn but there's just so much weird shit this model is capable of that no other local model can even really attempt to do.
https://files.catbox.moe/yeoxo8.png
https://files.catbox.moe/8g8p8j.png
https://files.catbox.moe/mzy25u.png
https://files.catbox.moe/lkr0jj.png
https://files.catbox.moe/0fqrq8.png
Replies: >>531
00301-574285328.png
[Hide] (4.2MB, 2304x1792)
00200-3273611029.png
[Hide] (4.3MB, 2688x1536)
>>530
ek the last one was unexpected kino
And also, I really really hope we get an improved version of the model later on, dealing with the artifacts on more """complex""" settings is getting a little difficult
Replies: >>532
00072-1891584092_copy.png
[Hide] (1MB, 1632x1152)
>>531
>dealing with the artifacts on more """complex""" settings is getting a little difficult
Honestly this shit has been bothering me for weird reasons. 1.5 was a garbage fire and I didn't really toil on training shit on it all that much but with pony the artifacting was surprisingly easy to solve just by using a lora, especially if it had pyramidal noise attached. And I could get it to generate actual white backgrounds and shit. Super easy. But no matter what I fucking do with this model it just doesn't care. Color blocks for skin tones is usually mostly fine but if it gets too close to white or black it gets so goddamn splotchy.
Really makes me wonder why the fuck pony could be "fixed" but not illustrious. Maybe pony was so absurdly fried that some layers were just nonfunctional/barely functional and a lora would just supplant those layers and work perfectly fine? it's a fucking mystery. Though, pony did still have a lot of splotchiness issues despite that. Gradients especially were fucked and would band horribly.
Replies: >>539
probably a weird question but I'm looking at HF and wondering, I could just privately store all of my gens there no problem, right? especially if it's a private dataset and I upload it archived with a password? are there any potential downsides to storing it there compared to mega for example?

I'm in the process of sorting and cleaning up my image folders and there's around 50 gigabytes of pngs and psds with unfinished shit. I might not necessarily need every single one of those but going through all of them and deleting them one by one is too tedious and aside from not wanting to store 50 gigs of hentai on my machine I want to have a backup
Replies: >>534
>>533
>privately 
lol

But no there's not any more downside than uploading to MEGA, Google Drive, or any of the million other "cloud" storage services.
it makes me wonder, do people report this shit or janny just go thru threads and delete this manually https://litter.catbox.moe/vv1ad5.png 
graceful janny, didn't gave me a warn for it
it's worse than reddit
Replies: >>536 >>537
>>535
All nogen posts should be deleted.
00004-1739287885.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1152x1632)
00016-455562574.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1152x1632)
>>526
added gestart, ru-neo and ootorii bisetsu(none of these need activation tags to work). And as before these are still pretty v1 and I haven't excessively tested them to any real degree. The line between "fried" and "undercooked" on this model is real fucking fickle and blurry.
>>535
the text post deletions have been really weird. At this point the only way to actually know what the fuck is going on with the moderation is to somehow find yourself under their employ and that would require doing shit for free. So we'll probably never know.
>>501
yeah i got zapped yesterday for https://files.catbox.moe/jqfink.png which is only loli if you either are functionally blind or have a vendetta

anyway i've been cooking some illustrious loras which ain't bad so far
Replies: >>540 >>542
>>532
idk what it is but unlike every other model, if you img2img illustrious from a pure black image with 1 denoise it will mostly just draw black instead of a dark image

seems strange
>>538
was it a global ban? 
i think all your posts got removed as well
Replies: >>541
>>540
yes he hit the purge /h/ button and the global ban since it's like the 6th time i've gotten banned for "loli" presumably by the same guy, ever since #3 it's been global
>>538
sorry anon, you don't have 10 disclaimers saying that it's merely cosplay and that it's really a 24 year old.
Otherwise with that outfit it looks too close to being, obviously, an undeveloped 12 year old and that's just plainly illegal - especially in australia, canada and britbongland.
(also even if you put disclaimers it would be ignored because you're clearly shitposting trying to skirt the rules)
Replies: >>543
>>542
what's even official 4chan politics about this
on one hand it states that specifically lolicon is banned on the other something about "age of participants", wtf even the latter suppose to mean, under 18 or something? that's like banning all nsfw anime altogether besides shit for deviants like hags
Replies: >>544 >>545 >>546
>>543
that's the fun part
no one knows and you don't find out until you're banned.
>>543
the rules are vague on purpose 
wtf is "trolling outside of /b/"? it's whatever the janny troon wants it to be if you need to be banned, same for loli. huge tit jk wearing sefuku?  UHHHH sorry that's a kid sir.
>>543
>Images should depict "of age" participants. Lolikon and shota images are not permitted.
You could argue about the definition of loli, but of age means of legal age so 18. 

Don't act like it's all of anime though. Even just looking at the other thread OPs on /h/, it's closer to half. That is if they were to truly start enforcing this.
Replies: >>547 >>549
>>546
below 18 is legal in most of the world including america so it's still vague
Replies: >>548
>>547
Legal to have sex with under certain narrow conditions, not legal to share pornography of. 

Only thing I don't understand is how putting them on /b/ suddenly makes it ok, if they are trying to cover their asses legally.
Replies: >>553
>>546
>legal age so 18
so, it's impossible to enforce it and it's only smokescreen for advertisers 
anime girls are amalgamation of both mature are immature features in different proportions no mater for their types like js, jc, jk or higher
because they don't follow accurate human anatomy it's impossible to appraise their "development", on top of that goes stylisation level 
lolicon is quite clear outline and that's why is usually banned, but that's about it 
there is no point in coping either way
Replies: >>550
>>549
That's also a thing in real life, can't always tell a person's age from their looks. The law applies to both actual and apparent ages, so most companies play it safe. We're still getting a lot of leeway here in comparison, just doesn't seem that way because things used to be much better.
Replies: >>551 >>552
>>550
>both actual and apparent
yeah i guess that makes sense
>>550
yes, irl females in first world countries end their pubescence and skeletal growth on average around 14-15 and it's impossible to tell then if they're 18 just from anthropometric perspective 
it's way more dumber when people do this to very unrealistic and stylised anime shit and it seems to get constantly worse
>>548
>Only thing I don't understand is how putting them on /b/ suddenly makes it ok, if they are trying to cover their asses legally.
it's about advertisers I think
Hello?
Replies: >>556 >>557
>>554
Herro
>>554
hi :)
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (642.7KB, 694x500)
big ggs to 4chan selling out to the normies even more so, top kek :^)

You fine lot are always welcome here. -J
Replies: >>559 >>562
>>558
I get "censorship bad" on principle, but have you ever read a post with more than three that was actually worth reading? It's always some angry /pol/ schizo that just needs to vent.

The comparison with 1984 is ridiculous. You can think and say whatever you want in private or in a group of friends, you just can't shout it out in public.
Replies: >>560 >>561 >>566
>>559
Why do you want to babysit public opinion like the world is one big kindergarten?
Niggers/shitskins are horrible. You help them in their own countries - they get dependent on your gibs and start multiplying like a plague. You invite them in your own country - your whole country gets turned into a shithole.
Trannies are so mentally weak they can't even accept reality and have to live in fantasy land. It's mental illness and must be called out for what it is.
The endgame of kindergarten society is just multiplying weakness in once strong societies until first world collapses and the whole planet is one big shithole. But at least everyone will be equal.
-Not J (may not be immediately obvious)
>>559
Erasure of culture is sickening. Replacing it with $corporate_preapproved_message is even worse because it flies in the face of what chan culture stood for in the past. It's like going to your favourite steakhouse only to find out they've been bought out by a rabid vegan who's replaced the beef with some fake meat substitute without telling the customers. I've even stopped going to 4chan now because it's been fully trooned now. Others are going there on name brand and memories of what it used to be, but cannot see that it is no longer what was. 4chan has fully sold out to corporate. -Jordach
Replies: >>562 >>564
>>558
so, you could use "nigger" outside of /b/?
last time i got 3days, also shit like "jeetmix" is constantly deleted
>>561
despite the changes, at least they could make and communicate clear and equally enforced rules
now it feels like every board or even thread has different ones
Replies: >>563 >>564
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (901.9KB, 680x766)
>>562
Always was allowed, whatever is going on right now is definitely corporate interference on a site that's historically anti-corporate - which tells me they're trying to prevent a Trump re-election with 4chan's meme magic as it were. Everything must be sacrificed to prevent that outcome. Second, if 4chan did make an announcement like that it'd be the end of 4chan entirely with AltChans like here and moe taking up the slack.

tl;dr it's going to get worse as corporate tries to prevent a Trump election victory -Jordach
00059-3509602668_copy.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1152x1632)
>>561
unabashed and unironic racism has never been "4chan culture." Even niggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerdoublenigger spam bullshit has been, very specifically, only /b/ tier culture. And that's only as far as edgelord shock factor shit. In fact, believe it or not, but the site was pretty left-leaning through the 00's. And shitholes like stormfront were raided by /b/ pretty regularly.
But, you know, if you pretend to be retarded, actual retards will come up and believe themselves to be in good company. /pol/ reinvigorating the old /news/ tier racism bullshit just turned everything to shit.
>>562
>so, you could use "nigger" outside of /b/?
I don't remember quite when the "racism outside of /b/" report function came into play but it was a while after /pol/ as a sort of bandaid to try and prevent the bleed of unwanted shitposters trying to pretend the whole site belonged to them. And enforcement of it has been really fucking spotty.
But yes, you could generally use it whenever/however you wanted pre-2016 or something.
Replies: >>565
>>564
>In fact, believe it or not, but the site was pretty left-leaning through the 00's. 
I agree with most of the other stuff but I really wouldn't call 4chan left-leaning. It was anti-establishment and closer to libertarian, than to anything that you could call "left" nowadays.
And even though I also think this niggerniggernigger stormfront crap is cringe and should be left to /b/ and /pol/, implementing those worngspeak filters is even worse.
Replies: >>566
>>565
Libertarianism in practice is a lot more toward the left than people would want to let you think it is(and neo dems are a lot further right than they pretend to be). Also remember that left=!""radical left"". Though I'd agree it's absolutely predominately anti-establishment. The only reason trump even caught on on 4chan was because 1. "man this would be fucking hilarious" and 2. it's fits into an accelerationist political approach where the goal is to burn shit to the ground(can't get more anti-establishment than that).
>implementing those worngspeak filters is even worse.
While I kind of agree that in a perfect world they'd just up moderation to compensate instead, I'm also kind of with >>559 in that people who spam that shit in their posts aren't posting anything really worth reading(though this may be because I can't imagine wanting to be in a thread where such posts would be "on topic"). 
It also seems like an extremely zoomer tier skill issue problem. Just think of new and more clever ways to be racist lmao. Or go back and rediscover old and weird slurs and start using those. It's not like the 4chinz lexicon has been static for 20 years.
That said, I should also probably point out that I have, at no point in time, been under the guise that I have or have ever expected to have "free speech" on the internet. And if anything, hiroshimoot has honestly probably been too hands off.
>And if anything, hiroshimoot has honestly probably been too hands off.
That's literally best case scenario no? As long as bills are paid by the owner, one should not care. Be concerned if sudden unannounced changes start happening.
Being an annoying niggerfaggot and shitting up discussion with meaningless buzzwords is not free speech. In fact, you are robbing others of theirs.
Replies: >>569
>>568
you don't have to use slurs to derail a thread and make it unusable
in case of /hdg/ problem is constant spam about NAI, pony, lolicon, discord screenshots, d-k tech talk, aco baits or comfy, use of buzzwords is the least important factor
h-hello?
Replies: >>571 >>572 >>573
>>570
nobody taking vacations now, check again next week
>>570
henlo uwu
00008-3327532391.png
[Hide] (163KB, 340x482)
00064-3242994624_copy.png
[Hide] (189.5KB, 340x482)
00067-2671805849.png
[Hide] (2.5MB, 1152x1632)
00078-2543725196.png
[Hide] (2.5MB, 1152x1632)
>>570
mods have been weird lately and the people who've been catching vacations have probably been a bit more careful to compensate. 
and like the other anon said, vacations are seemingly what drive activity here.
have some gundams(and a gouf) to compensate.
3854_ff2d4b94e0f01e0c.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
3861_779b7e91994c8549.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 832x1216)
08490bf76c65641d09dc1c47d35d38e90ba82de90e216b9908746cb2e5f93f7e.png
[Hide] (2.9MB, 1152x1632)
4e07730b817ff2a739b6b03cce1d6cb312e41ca0af348801f4760a623242c78f.png
[Hide] (3.6MB, 1632x1152)
00122-2710585430.png
[Hide] (3.1MB, 1152x1632)
>hdg thread took an extreme noticeable nosedive in general post quality in the span of a few hours yesterday and is still in the shitter
>suddenly it appears like the thread sliding(read: bumping older threads to bury threads at post bump limit) is back
hrm
HRM
this surely is not suspicious at all.
though the thread sliding isn't anywhere as overt as it was before. it's a bit slower and they're *attempting* to be more on topic than they were before when/where they can(though if you spend more time than it's worth trying to look you'll find a few obvious low effort textposts).
also not sure if anyone else has noticed but there seemed to have also been a significant drop in post deletions/assumed bans for the past week, which I'm not entirely sure how to interpret.
Feels like the major proponent in all of this either caught a 1 week ban or maybe they were hit by helene and their power just turned back on.
artist_gloss,_artist_sweetonedollar,_artist_fizrotart,_artist_s16xue,_artist_qua_s-2381450063.png
[Hide] (3.7MB, 1856x1280)
2.jpg
[Hide] (392.9KB, 1856x1280)
3.jpg
[Hide] (384.6KB, 1280x1856)
4.jpg
[Hide] (405.4KB, 1280x1856)
5.jpg
[Hide] (416.9KB, 1856x1280)
h-hello?
Replies: >>581 >>582 >>583
>>580
It's over.
00108-3819052301.png
[Hide] (2.6MB, 1152x1632)
00056-3638128625_copy.png
[Hide] (3.2MB, 1152x1632)
00028-268040799_copy.png
[Hide] (3.1MB, 1152x1632)
>>580
>have gotten a post removed, presumably because.... too flat?
>but didn't get a warning or a ban
maybe hdg is under slightly new management?
it's a mystery.

also friendly reminder to watch llenn's show.
Replies: >>584
>>580
hewgo owo
>>582
while the change in moderation is noticeable, thread feels somehow  like a bigger shithole than usual, despite the new models 
but maybe it's because i've been busy with other things lately and am looking at it from a different perspective
Replies: >>585 >>586
>>584
it seems to come and go in waves at certain timeframes. we had a few days where it was actually pretty good but, of course, nothing lasts forever, etc.
cathag(or at least someone doing a pretty good impression of them) seems to be having a massive meltdown for whatever reason(though I guess they were in a perpetual state of that anyway) and then there's some retarded tourist that I don't even know how the fuck they found the thread trying to shill their shiny as fuck garbage for whatever reason.
the moderation shift is real fucking weird though and I'm not quite sure what to make of it. Not complaining(though reisen being removed is weird), just real pensive about it.
>>584
>thread feels somehow  like a bigger shithole than usual
does it? i don't think it can possibly be worse than it was 2 months ago
I got banned for posting a gen with a cameltoe on a blue board, fucking 'ell
Replies: >>588
>>587
Safe horny is a fucking cancer that's going to kill sites quick. Even fucking plebbit is less puritan, what the actual fuck.
Replies: >>590
ell_no.jpg
[Hide] (159.7KB, 1631x461)
>>588
I was really surprised by it, even more given the kind of official real art being posted there
example: https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8012541?q=azur_lane+official_art+

Completely bullshit ban
Replies: >>591 >>595
>>590
Would you look at that image while your boss is standing behind you?
Replies: >>592 >>594
>>591
Come on now, plenty of /vg/ threads and the one were I posted have plenty of images on the same degree of explicit, as I said, is a complete bullshit that I got banned for that
Replies: >>593
>>592
Sometimes jannies are awake, sometimes they aren't. You got unlucky.
>>591
i wouldn't at any picture with anime girl
>>590
I mean, I get the meme of "lol sfw 4chan" and it being a fucking joke but blue boards are blue for a reason and it's specifically to make it so that not every thread devolves into porn and you can actually maintain a line of topic. And you have to enforce it or the rules have no real teeth.
"Official art" gets a pass on this shit because it's being released and passing marketing thresholds or whatever bullshit you want to describe it as. fanart stuff doesn't go through any of that at all 
tbh, I wouldn't recommend posting anything with overt, plain pantsu on a blue board, much less something with cameltoe.
Replies: >>597
>>595
>not every thread devolves into porn and you can actually maintain a line of topic
do you think every board is /b/ or something? most red boards didn't turn into porn dumps. gif and b are the only boards that degenerated due to porn I think
Replies: >>598
>>597
can you really say with a straight face that /vg/, if it were a red board, wouldn't devolve into an unusable mess?
keep in mind that it's already barely usable as a blue board.
either way, it's not really about it *always* happening without the blue board distinction, it's about preventing any possibility of it happening, ever. And porn/lewd shit usually doesn't actually give or contribute much to actual discussion, so there isn't much point in condoning letting it through.
3990_aa06bef3cef70706.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1024x1024)
4007_a79b819e074d3560.png
[Hide] (975KB, 1024x1024)
3963_992ca8f515d46a71.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
3962_5ceb72012fb2567a.png
[Hide] (848.3KB, 832x1216)
4083_95fbe77f91462d55.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1024x1024)
4106_f70c1f331bf874cf.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1024x1024)
4075_642b29d7b81558a6.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1024x1024)
00068-192371252.png
[Hide] (3.2MB, 1152x1632)
00053-2311186778.png
[Hide] (3.1MB, 1152x1632)
00176-818326308.png
[Hide] (2.5MB, 1152x1632)
https://files.catbox.moe/5jvjs7.png
fucking lmao
meanwhile there's currently a schizo going hard as fuck on the thread over the past few hours, so that's great
oh well. this was kind of vaguely planned as being "okay," anyway, since I'll be unbanned on halloween. And by the same token that also means that I'll probably get banned, again, on halloween, but who the fuck even cares at this point.
00013-3970319921_copy.png
[Hide] (3.2MB, 1632x1152)
00124-3352055771.png
[Hide] (3.4MB, 1152x1632)
00062-882322141.png
[Hide] (3.1MB, 1152x1632)
>go back and look at the thread from yesterday and this morning
jesus christ.
and tangentially related; the TE on .75 is absolutely fried. The unet might also be a bit singed but the TE is definitely showing some bad symptoms and it's starting to fry colors as a result.
which is kind of a shame since it does do some things a lot better than .5 - some artists actually started working, a number of them work better and some lower occurrence style impacting tags can do a good bit more(an example is the 'low poly' tag).
also pretty sure that anyone bitching about it being something to do with the e621 dataset is just being an old man shaking their fist at the sky over fucking nothing. Shit's fried and that's really kind of just the extent of it.
(images unrelated they were made on .5)
01230-3139931268.png
[Hide] (2.7MB, 1536x1536)
01231-1037546866.png
[Hide] (3.7MB, 2048x2048)
01232-2553700216.png
[Hide] (2.5MB, 1536x1536)
.75 may be a bust, but whatever that "itercomp" merge does is pretty interesting
4015_126d2d3d3304a326.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 832x1216)
4035_036f7c3531622c7e.png
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1024x1024)
firefox_2024-11-03-19-25-05_copy.png
[Hide] (71.8KB, 767x353)
00101-1552978211.png
[Hide] (3MB, 1152x1632)
it's just all so fucking tiresome.
Replies: >>609 >>612
00088-3095343618.png
[Hide] (2.4MB, 1152x1632)
00002-2650871770.png
[Hide] (2MB, 1152x1632)
00056-1935874560.png
[Hide] (2.7MB, 1152x1632)
>>607
don't get me wrong, but her head is humongous in relation to rest of the body
sure, stylisation and shit, but those almost chibish proportion are the reason why are you hit by bans so often
Replies: >>610
00025-3793949911_copy.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1152x1632)
>>609
it's fucking reisen. And with the pose/position the breasts are pretty strongly pushing to C cup territory.
And I'm really not seeing it being "chibi" at all. All the head mass is in the hair - the head is a "bit" larger than natural proportions but it's weebshit and pretty much on mark for that. See image related for what would actually be chibi.
And even if you consider it "chibi" I have no idea how the fuck that could relate at all to "b-b-but it's underaged!" It doesn't look like a child and it's an extremely well established character. 
Also take a look at the actual thread as a whole. Shitposting is going completely unstopped, there are significantly more clear examples of borderline "loli" shit being posted and not deleted.
I feel like a massive fag for saying it but it just feels real blatantly obvious that there's a toolbag of a janny facilitating shitposting and also intentionally targeting me at this point for whatever reason and getting by on none of their moderation being reviewed.
Replies: >>611
>>610
chill, it's not like i'm saying that you should be banned
and yes, you are targeted by some anons, because everybody recognisable will get shit and jannies will just accept those reports based on first impression
Replies: >>613
>>607
Damn, fuck jannies and schizos, my condolences
00061-1307249761.png
[Hide] (3.2MB, 1632x1152)
00061-1079870309.png
[Hide] (3MB, 1152x1632)
00163-3175122312.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1152x1632)
>>611
No, I find it a lot harder to believe it's a functional failing for the report system and an unwitting, completely unrelated janitor going "uh yeah sure that's lolicon!" It happens too consistently to really be complete coincidence. 
Also I'd be willing to put $5 on the retard who replied to me with
>isn't that a kid
being the actual janny in question. They did something similar on /e/ ages ago(but for "/aco/" :^) ) after deleting a post and then banning me for being off-topic when I called them a retard for it.
Ultimately it's not really a big deal it's just really annoying and a bit of a really weird joke to get banned for reisen. The thread is also probably going to be more or less unusable for the next three days just like it was after .75 got released(and hey I got banned right away then, too).
Replies: >>614
>>613
maybe that's true or maybe you see faces in random patterns 
that's a child, lolicon goes to /b/, chuddies etc. are just notorious running jokes/ memes, repeted definitively by more then one person
besides not every (you) about it is an attack, for example when you posted Shinobu i commented "daring today but can't tell if that's loli or not", well it was just a joke because i found it funny that you posted one of the most staple loli characters considering your constant bans
Replies: >>615
00082-1576935234.png
[Hide] (3.2MB, 1632x1152)
00031-514902830.png
[Hide] (2.6MB, 1152x1632)
00025-1374578329.png
[Hide] (2.2MB, 1152x1632)
>>614
I know, and I also know there's been a lot of, recent specifically 
>isn't that hyper
posting. But nothing ever comes of that because, lol, jannies are retarded and doesn't actually understand what does and does not belong in /h/. But 
>isn't that a kid
reads a lot more as a straight report announcement. The other replies in chain are what makes it read like it's a janny that gets high on their own jenkem, tbh. 
>or maybe you see faces in random patterns
hence why I'd only put $5 on it. It's either a shitposting trying to make a show of shit or one of the shitposting cohort.
{{burger_with_a_pussy}},_artist_gloss,_artist_sweetonedollar,_artist_fizrotart,_s-550599031.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1024x1024)
{{huge_penis_on_a_burger}},_artist_gloss,_artist_sweetonedollar,_artist_fizrotar_s-2882921621.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 1024x1024)
{{3girls,_kneeling,_1boy,_pov,_close-up,_wlop,_redrop}},_artist_bernie_wrightson_s-2872866221.png
[Hide] (3.9MB, 1920x1088)
{{1girl,_burger,_huge_breasts,_nipples,_food_focus,_object_focus}},_artist_gloss_s-4187518435.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1024x1024)
old crap
00116-1249392303.png
[Hide] (1.8MB, 1632x1152)
00133-612180177.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1632x1152)
00141-698339909.png
[Hide] (2.1MB, 1632x1152)
00000-3722367197.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1152x1632)
>finally rerun gestart dataset on noob0.5
>run two variants, first with a default LR setup and the second with slightly adjusted values
>can't tell which is 'better'
one seems like it's a bit more on-model while the other seems like it does a bit better on textures/details/lighting depth.
how troubling.
(ignore weird error stuff, these are raw upscales with no edits/inpainting)
(also these aren't really wholly representative of the lora by itself, as I'm also tagging artists to direct the aesthetic)
Replies: >>618
>>617
sounds like both variants might be useful in their own way, I like the second version more
Replies: >>619
00032-4182180847.png
[Hide] (2.2MB, 1152x1632)
00086-1108196142.png
[Hide] (2.3MB, 1152x1632)
00148-2524767057.png
[Hide] (3MB, 1152x1632)
>>618
yeah, I could see a valid use case either way(hence why it's slightly troubling)
however;
>I like the second version more
Is pretty much where I'm leaning(assuming you meant the second to being the version used for sanae/kurisu). Texturing on clothes from it, especially for darker tones, is just really strong.
It also works pretty well with arako o type paint patterning, which is nice.
also I already indirectly linked it on 4chinz but may as well also post it here
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/pa5cfv0u2t0fz/gestart
Replies: >>620
>>619
>assuming you meant the second to being the version used for sanae/kurisu
yeah, those are great
thanks
h-hello?
Replies: >>622
>>621
herro owo
[New Reply]
443 replies | 374 files
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news - rules - faq -